Take another quiz >
thumb

Countries by Change in Carbon Dioxide Emissions

Name the countries that have increased or decreased their carbon dioxide emissions by the most since 2000.
  • 2000-2013 according to the World Bank
  • In thousands of metric tons
  • Quiz by Quizmaster - Jan 06, 2017
Give Up?
Enter answer here
0 / 20 guessed
The quiz is paused. You have remaining.
Scoring
You scored /20 = %.
This beats or equals % of test takers
The average score is
Your high score is
Your best time is remaining
Points
You have earned / 5 points for this quiz
This quiz is not eligible for points
Next Level
/
Keep scrolling down for answers and more stats ...
×
Help

Enter answers in the area marked "Enter answer here".

You can enter any answer, at any time - they don't have to be in order

Punctuation and capitalization don't matter on JetPunk.

Reduction
Country
%
-515,000
-9
-106,000
-24
-84,300
-16
-72,700
-9
-58,800
-11
-57,500
-20
-49,800
-16
-28,900
-8
-25,200
-20
-22,500
-25
Gain
Country
%
6,840,000
+201
1,000,000
+97
244,000
+66
244,000
+82
231,000
+14
216,000
+82
176,000
+54
145,000
+32
145,000
+123
122,000
+67
Answer Stats
Gain / Loss
Country
% Correct
Your %
(73)
What's the unit size of gain/loss out of curiosity?
reply
delete
Jan 6, 2017
Metric tons. Forgot to put that in.
reply
delete
Jan 7, 2017
(54)
Should be thousands of tons, actually.
delete
Jan 8, 2017
Fixed!
delete
Jan 11, 2017
(57)
Most depressing quiz ever.
reply
delete
Jan 7, 2017
But there is good news too. Nearly every country in the west is using less co2 than before. Britain's carbon dioxide emissions peaked in 1971, and have declined by about 1/3rd since. Adoption of electric vehicles will accelerate the decline.
reply
delete
Jan 7, 2017
Not to mention solar!
delete
Jan 7, 2017
(47)
Most of the decline in the developed world's carbon emissions can be attributed manufacturing being outsourced to places like China and India, according to the Guardian After you take into account imports, Europe only reduced their carbon footprint by 1% between 1990 and 2008.
delete
Jan 8, 2017
(60)
Also in very recent years there has been a decrease in global emissions, mainly caused by China significantly reducing coal burning.
delete
Apr 3, 2017
(28)
Really that's irrelevant though. All of the decreases combined barely make up for the gain in *India*, let alone China.
delete
Apr 5, 2017
(60)
What's so bad about C02? It's plant food for Christ's sake!
reply
delete
Jan 8, 2017
(29)
exactly!
delete
Jan 8, 2017
It's got what plants crave!
delete
Apr 3, 2017
(74)
It's got electrolytes!
delete
Apr 3, 2017
(58)
Actually, without any carbon dioxide warming the Earth, the planet would largely be too cold for people to live on.
delete
Apr 3, 2017
(32)
Oxygen is also good, but too much of it can kill you. The effects of excess CO2 (climate change, sea level rise, coral bleaching, ice melt etc etc etc) and so well linked and demonstrated that I can't believe we're still having this debate.
delete
Apr 5, 2017
(58)
Asia gain, Europe reduce. Nice to see we reduced by nearly 10 percent!
reply
delete
Jan 7, 2017
(60)
Yes, but you lose while other parts of the world gain in emissions. That's why all of these climate change laws make no sense. Outsourcing companies to countries that can't handle environmental protection as well as us just so we don't feel guilty is stupid.
reply
delete
Jan 8, 2017
(62)
The patient is smiling even though he's dying. Well that's some relief.
reply
delete
Jan 8, 2017
(37)
ahh! I missed only Kazakhstan
reply
delete
Jan 8, 2017
(59)
Nice to see we're doing SOMETHING right.
reply
delete
Jan 8, 2017
(49)
No we don't. This should really be corrected by imported and exported CO2. And include CO2 generated by the transport on international trading routes. I don't think it does that.
reply
delete
Jan 9, 2017
(62)
Exactly. The West has not reduced its consumption of CO2. It just has outsourced its production abroad. Which is utterly stupid, because we are still living in the same planet.
delete
Apr 3, 2017
The West definitely has reduced its consumption per capita at the very least. Improvements in fuel efficiency standards for cars and insulation for buildings have made a difference. Its not enough obviously, but lets not pretend that no progress has been made. And with the coming solar revolution, I think its possible that things will continue to improve, certain politicians non-withstanding.
delete
Apr 3, 2017
(28)
Yes the West is screwing itself over economically by trying to reduce its carbon emissions, meanwhile none of the developing countries care.
delete
Apr 5, 2017
(71)
Can't believe I got them all
reply
delete
Jan 31, 2017
(63)
And people still claim that China is leading the world in combating climate change
reply
delete
Apr 3, 2017
(58)
Remember this is a 13 year period i.e. much of it is history before climate change was viewed so significantly, and before Paris Accords, etc.
reply
delete
Apr 3, 2017
(60)
The numbers are slightly misleading. As several people have said a lot of that increase is due to outsourcing from western countries, and China have been reducing their emissions for a while now. The average American still uses the energy equivalent of at least 3 Chinese people (I've heard up to 10).
reply
delete
Apr 3, 2017
Source? As of the latest data I have, China's emissions continue to increase rapidly.

But, yes, the average American still uses twice as much as China.

delete
Apr 4, 2017
(60)
I think it was around 2013 that the drop began (although in your data the climb really started to decrease in 2012). This is about coal but I think for China it's almost directly proportional: 'decrease of 2.9% in 2014, ... 3.6% decrease in 2015' Click here And this is what I was referring to with the American:Chinese energy consumption, the average American uses 3.1 times that of the average Chinese person.
delete
Apr 4, 2017
(60)
Sorry about the terrible HTML, I haven't left a link before. But global C02 emissions haven't grown in the last few years and it's been largely attributed to China's drop in coal use (that link actually directly says that CO2 emissions in China declined by 1.5% in 2015). That '10 times' figure I mentioned came from that Before the Flood documentary, I don't have a source for it though.
delete
Apr 4, 2017
Interesting. I couldn't get the Nature article to load, but I did find some other articles that seemed to suggest China's emissions were down slightly (less than 1%). That's great news.

The US may use 3 times the energy per capita as China, but we only generate a little more than 2 times the CO2 because our coal use is much less. The 10x figure was probably accurate 15 or 20 years ago.

delete
Apr 4, 2017
(51)
Wealthy countries in the west are just outsourcing their industrial pollution to emerging countries, where they use the dirtiest energy on the planet. See it go down in the U.S. and Germany while China and India skyrockets, where they actually make all that green tech along with the rest of everything else we purchase and use. It IS a depressing quiz and there is no "good news" here.
reply
delete
Apr 3, 2017
The US is manufacturing more than ever, and doing so with far less carbon output than before. Let's not be defeatist and refuse to acknowledge the very real progress that has been made.
reply
delete
Apr 4, 2017
(28)
Nah we're screwing ourselves over by falling for the stupid carbon reduction meme. None of the other countries care, they will trample all over us.
delete
Apr 5, 2017
×
Congrats!
You have reached a new level
To save this level, you'll have to
create an account
×
Congrats!
You have earned a new badge
To save this badge, you'll have to
create an account