Take another quiz >
thumb

Losing Presidential Candidates

Name the candidates who got at least 10% of the vote, but still lost.
  • Republican
    Democratic
    Other
Give Up?
Enter candidate here:
0 / 56 guessed
Scoring
You scored /56 = %.
This beats or equals % of test takers
The average score is
Your high score is
Your best time is remaining
Points
You have earned / 5 points for this quiz
This quiz is not eligible for points
Next Level
/
Keep scrolling down for answers and more stats ....
The quiz is paused. You have remaining.
×
Help

Enter answers in the area marked "Enter candidate here".

You can enter any answer, at any time - they don't have to be in order

Punctuation and capitalization don't matter on JetPunk.

Year
Candidate
2012
2008
2004
2000
1996
1992
1992
1988
1984
1980
1976
1972
1968
1968
1964
1960
1956
1952
1948
1944
1940
1936
Year
Candidate
1932
1928
1924
1924
1920
1916
1912
1912
1908
1904
1900
1896
1892
1888
1884
1880
1876
1872
1868
1864
1860
1860
Year
Candidate
1860
1856
1856
1852
1848
1844
1840
1836
1832
1828
1824
1824
1824
1820
Uncontested
1816
1812
1808
1804
1800
1796
1792
Uncontested
1789
Uncontested
Answer Stats
Year
Candidate
% Correct
Your %
(70)
Completing the top entry of this quiz has given me a certain sense of closure on the 2012 election. Good luck to us all in the next four years.
reply
delete
Nov 7, 2012
(19)
How did only 98% of people get romney?
reply
delete
Nov 7, 2012
(62)
He's just that forgettable. I got most back to 1960, and the first few, plus most that ran unsuccessfully for a 2nd term or had an unsuccessful 1st bid before they won. I also got Al Smith just on a complete guess, whoever that is, when I was typing in random common names.
reply
delete
Jan 6, 2013
jennywren21
(39)
Same for me; I have only been voting since the 90's; so after that I started with other presidents, knowing that some would have lost their first bid, and after that, it was Smith, Parker, etc- common last names (which is also a fun quiz on here too).
delete
Jul 13, 2014
(62)
Henry Clay, most accomplished loser in presidential history. I remember learning about him in 10th grade history.
reply
delete
Jan 6, 2013
(42)
You mean loser who didn't end up winning eventually I expect...Henry Clay is an accomplished political figure, but he doesn't rank above John Adams or Thomas Jefferson I would think. As for Adams, I believe that at the time he ran for President he was, and still stands as, the most accomplished person ever to be elected President for the 1st time. He had been the driving force at the Continental Congress in declaring Independence, had gone to Paris and then to Amsterdam to negotiate alliances and was a signatory and negotiator of the Treaty of Paris that ended the Revolutionary War, served as the 1st US Ambassador to Great Britain, and was then of course the first Vice President. With all of that to his credit, I would put Adams still to this day as the most qualified man ever elected President. Both he, Jefferson, and some others on the list who were Presidents before or after they lost, are also more accomplished than Clay.
reply
delete
Mar 27, 2013
(62)
yes, I meant that Clay was a loser in that he repeatedly ran and lost and never actually won. He was much better at losing presidential races than almost anyone unless you want to count people like Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, or Lyndon LaRouche.. but they were never serious contenders.
Of course Clay's accomplishments didn't even come close to matching Adams' or Jefferson's or Roosevelt's, who all later won.
reply
delete
Jun 1, 2013
(62)
William Jennings Bryan was another one who was always running and losing. I remember learning about him, as well. He's tied with Clay here for most appearances. Though Clay's career of losing elections was longer than Bryan's. He was at it for 20+ years.
reply
delete
Jun 1, 2013
(66)
Based on what I learned in history class, the biggest injustice to the office of the president was the fact that neither Henry Clay nor William Jennings Bryan held office. Both would have been more competent than the presidents that we had during that time. Perhaps we wouldn't have had a depression in the mid 1800s had Clay been there. Maybe we would have actually had a competent president at the turn of the century instead of a revolving door of one-term buffoons if Bryan took office. Who knows.
delete
Jun 23, 2015
ItaloSvevo
(43)
If I remember correctly, Bryan not only lost his state and his Congressional district, but the precinct in which he lived in his 1900 defeat by McKinley.
delete
Jul 3, 2015
New and Popular
Similar Quizzes by Tag