Take another quiz >
thumb

The George W. Bush Presidency

Guess these facts about George W. Bush and his presidency.
Give Up?
Enter answer here
0 / 27 guessed
The quiz is paused. You have remaining.
Scoring
You scored /27 = %.
This beats or equals % of test takers
The average score is
Your high score is
Your best time is remaining
Points
You have earned / 5 points for this quiz
This quiz is not eligible for points
Next Level
/
Keep scrolling down for answers and more stats ...
×
Help

Enter answers in the area marked "Enter answer here".

You can enter any answer, at any time - they don't have to be in order

Punctuation and capitalization don't matter on JetPunk.

Hint
Answer
His middle name
His nickname
(based on his middle initial)
His Vice President
Countries invaded by the U.S.
State he was governor of
2004 election opponent
2000 election opponent
Baseball team he co-owned
State he was born in
Education legislation that he
signed in 2001
No Child
Left Behind
What the W in WMD stands for
Ace of spades on
the U.S. Military's card deck
What "Gitmo" is a nickname for
Hint
Answer
Prison in Iraq notorious for abuse
Political advisor known as "Turd Blossom"
Rapper who said George Bush doesn't
care about black people
Secretary of State
Secretary of Defense (2001-2006)
Disease he commited $15 billion to fighting
Fill the blanks in these Bush-era quotes
You are either with us or against us
Shock and awe
Axis of evil
Mission accomplished
Brownie, you're doing a heck of a job
Rarely is the question asked, is our children learning?
Answer Stats
Hint
Answer
% Correct
Your %
(48)
"Ace of spades on the U.S. Military's card deck" ......well that question could have been worded a little bit better.
reply
delete
Jul 12, 2013
(41)
Uh...yeah. That makes no sense.
reply
delete
Jul 12, 2013
I tried my best. Want to rewrite it in 10 words or less? And since 45% of people answered that question, it would seem that it's not TOO poorly worded.
reply
delete
Jul 12, 2013
(43)
I knew exactly what you were referring to. If someone doesn't understand the reference, that's indicative that they should have been paying closer attention to the news a decade ago (or history class!).
delete
Jul 12, 2013
(47)
Yeah it was easy to understand. The deck of cards with all the terrorists' faces was huge news and widely popular, especially in shows and movies about the war in Iraq.
delete
Jul 12, 2013
(67)
Knew exactly what it was immediately.
delete
Jul 12, 2013
(55)
I knew exactly what you meant.
delete
Jul 14, 2013
(31)
I think it is less that people understood it and more that people started guessing names involved in the presidency.
delete
Sep 2, 2013
(44)
I missed a few. I'm excited for this quiz series though :) Great idea!
reply
delete
Jul 12, 2013
(51)
Worst. President. Ever.
reply
delete
Jul 17, 2013
(69)
Only the 10th worst according to aggregate polling data, though personally I might rank him lower than that. I think that 50 or 100 years from now if the USA has become like the UK is now, and historians are looking back at what led to the decline of the empire, they could very well pin it on Bush and Reagan. It might not have been very apparent while it was happening, and it's not yet clear exactly what impact it will have in the long run, but those two essentially sold out the country to corporations and bankers. The death of American democracy may be linked to the overturning of the Fairness Doctrine and the rise of certain cable news channels that enabled a plutocratic take over, and the Citizens United decision. Both of those happened under Democratic presidents but in each case the preceding administration deliberately helped lay the groundwork.
reply
delete
Jul 17, 2013
(22)
his popularity has increased during the Obama presidency
delete
Oct 25, 2013
(69)
Only amongst short-sighted and very forgetful lunatics. Certainly not amongst presidential scholars.
delete
Mar 26, 2015
(62)
Are you implying that only lunatics don't like Obama?
delete
Mar 11, 2017
(58)
NOPE! That title is shared by Carter and Obama.
reply
delete
Dec 1, 2014
(58)
Business men and women have way more insight into who are the worst Presidents than some scholar who has never worked day in his or her life.
delete
May 28, 2015
(69)
Oh okay in that case... under Obama corporate profits are up 166%, the country has added 10 million jobs and unemployment has dropped below median levels, the S&P 500 is up 165%, exports are up 31%, crude oil production is up 87%, and the price of a barrel of oil dropped from over $100 to less than 40.
The economy also boomed under Clinton.
Under Carter it wasn't so great, but it still grew. It didn't tank like it did under Bush or Nixon or Hoover (under which it didn't so much tank as completely implode).
So, I imagine if we were asking an honest businessman who knew anything about what he was talking about, then he would tell you that Obama was either the best or 2nd best president in his lifetime, and the worst was, in fact, George W Bush.
delete
Oct 23, 2016
(66)
Why the hell should businessmen have "way more insight" into anything other than running a business??
delete
Oct 26, 2016
(69)
I think he's implying that Obama and Carter were somehow bad for business or the economy. In Obama's case that is simply flat out wrong. In Carter's case, it becomes wrong if the standard you are using to measure "badness" is saying that he was worse than Bush. Which he was not. Not by a long shot.
delete
Oct 26, 2016
(72)
We'll have to wait and see the full impact of Obamacare on the nation's finances and health system, but current trends are not good.

And how can you say that Carter was better economically than Bush? Rampant inflation, 20% increase in citizens under the poverty line, and the energy crisis was largely driven by his encouragement to a fully-Democrat controlled Congress to maintain price controls on natural gas and impose huge taxes on industrial crude oil. "You break it, you own it" certainly applies to Carter here. And he did all this in just 4 years.
delete
Oct 26, 2016
(69)
Did you forget what happened at the end of the Bush administration? I can't understand the blind spots people seem to have when looking at Bush. They talk about him keeping the country safe... completely ignoring 9/11 like that doesn't count. And here you talk about the economy as if the total and complete economic meltdown that nearly crashed the global economy in 2008 didn't happen. Yes, Carter's economy was bad. Bush's was far worse. The stock market grew 6% under Carter. Not great. It shrank 4.6% under Bush. Terrible. Bush came into office with a 100+ million dollar budget surplus and turned it into a $1.4 trillion deficit. Carter's administration saw the creation of 8.6 million jobs. Bush's saw a net loss of 340 thousand, and lots more if you consider the bleeding continued heavily into the start of the Obama administration. They're just not even close.
delete
Oct 26, 2016
(69)
and Republicans have been predicting Obamacare would ruin the country for a long time, even though it was their idea (essentially identical to Bob Dole's healthcare reform plan from the 90s), but hyperbole aside what has it actually done?
delete
Oct 26, 2016
(63)
My premiums increased every year for 10 years prior to "Obamacare." Small business insurance plans were worse every year and so were bigger company's plans. Plans became deductible plans rather than full coverage - all prior to the Affordable Care Act.
delete
Oct 26, 2016
(35)
@kalbahamut, just lost ALL respect for you, not just some. Actually are having some thoughts that you are one of my substitute teachers... If you aren't, you two should get along nicely.
delete
Mar 10, 2017
(40)
NOT true!
reply
delete
Oct 14, 2016
(77)
Forever is a long long time. Personally, I think the worst president ever will be the one that nukes Mars in 2338 AD. I mean, what a jackass!
reply
delete
Oct 26, 2016
(54)
Yeah. To hell with President Timberlake.
delete
Oct 26, 2016
(70)
I think you mean Trump.
delete
Oct 26, 2016
(54)
He was bad. He was not the worst.
reply
delete
Oct 26, 2016
(45)
Better than Obama
reply
delete
Oct 26, 2016
(69)
Out of all metrics you could possibly come up with to measure the quality of a president, Bush comes out ahead of Obama on maybe 1% of them. Only one I can even think of is growth of the national debt. (and he was far far worse on growth of the national deficit)
delete
Oct 27, 2016
(29)
I think that both Bush and Obama have been mediocre Presidents. While Obama has seen some good economic gains, we've seen a massive increase in the debt, and continued terrorism both abroad and at home. We've also seen kidnappings of American sailors, and full on riots in some of our inner cities, with poor leadership. Bush had 9/11, which arguable trumps all that though, combined with expensive and ineffective foreign entanglements. They've both had weak foreign policy in my opinion, and I'm inclined to hope we can see some improvement no matter who wins this Tuesday, but I know we probably won't. In the end, Bush v. Obama is really a question of what you want in a President. Just my opinion.
delete
Nov 6, 2016
(69)
Needle you're entitled to your opinion of course, but.. kidnapping of American sailors? That's an overstatement. And a total non-event in the grand scheme. American sailors entered sovereign Iranian territory due to navigational error, this is not in dispute, they were legally detained, and then later released. Obama has rained hell down upon terrorist leaders all over the globe. He has killed or captured tons of AlQaeda, Al Shabab, ISIS, Taleban and other terrorist leaders including Anwar Al-Awlaki, Akhtar Mansoor, and of course Osama bin Laden. All told more than 30,000 terrorists have been taken out during his administration, and hundreds of terrorist plots have been thwarted including many on US soil. The riots are hardly Obama's fault though the GOP likes to try and pin it on him, as if somehow having a "black" president just made people so upset they couldn't help but be racist.
delete
Nov 8, 2016
(69)
As for foreign policy, Bush started a disastrous pointless war in Iraq, and another in Afghanistan that would become the nation's longest-running. Both very costly in capital and human lives. Bush saw the reputation of the US abroad absolutely TANK. I can attest to this personally as I live overseas and travel so much. I mean it was totally destroyed. He squandered massive political capital the country had after 9/11 and just totally pissed it away by being belligerent, aggressive and uncooperative with our allies. He really made most of the world hate us, only making gains in Georgia for aid against the Russians and in Africa where he did good work combating AIDS. Obama has done a lot to repair some of the damage Bush did. He managed to take out Qaddafi without ever setting American boots on the ground. He took out bin Laden without invading Pakistan. He ended the occupation of Iraq (I know, that was on Bush's timetable. Still). He's been restrained, smart, shrewd.
delete
Nov 8, 2016
(69)
I'll give you the point on the debt. Some Democrats will say it was necessary given the dire shape the country was in when Bush handed it off to Obama, and that's a fair point, but it was also 8 years ago and the deficit is shrinking, but still massive. My biggest problem with Obama is that he has been far too conciliatory toward Republicans. Trying to reach out to them over and over and over again only to get his hand bit. And he never seemed to learn from this. He should have pressed the huge political advantage he had from 2000-2002 to get single payer healthcare and advance more of his progressive agenda, but he didn't. Clinton was able to outmaneuver Republicans in the 90s when they pulled some of the same BS shenanigans like threatening to shutdown the government. Obama wasn't quite as gifted at dealing with Washington obstructionism and politicking. He was an idealist and this cost his administration a lot of momentum.

Still... way WAAAAY better than Bush.
delete
Nov 8, 2016
(69)
To back up one second about the "kidnapped" sailors thing... it is much to Obama and his administration's credit that the sailors were released without any incident. It was America's fault. To hear some Republicans talk about this as a failure, you would think that they would have preferred turning it into some major international incident. For what? To show how big our balls are? Maybe they wanted a repeat of the Iran hostage crisis.. we could send in some CIA teams to fail and retrieve them. Or maybe start a war. That would not have been better.
delete
Nov 8, 2016
(44)
Man, I miss the old days of five weeks ago, when we could say that with a straight face.
reply
delete
Feb 23, 2017
(59)
I always think it's Abu Ghirab. Shoot.
reply
delete
Oct 26, 2016
(45)
Did the same thing. Couldn't spell it correctly
reply
delete
Oct 27, 2016
(60)
"Turd blossom"?? Lol. For some reason that didn't make it across the Pond. I really can't imagine why the BBC never referred to him as that.
reply
delete
Nov 1, 2016
(29)
9/11
reply
delete
Feb 23, 2017
×
Congrats!
You have reached a new level
To save this level, you'll have to
create an account
×
Congrats!
You have earned a new badge
To save this badge, you'll have to
create an account