thumbnail

2016 Summer Olympics Medal Count

Name the countries that won the most medals at the 2016 Summer Olympics in Rio.
Quiz by hwes
Rate:
Last updated: August 22, 2016
You have not attempted this quiz yet.
First submittedAugust 21, 2016
Times taken23,769
Average score76.2%
Rating4.48
Report this quizReport
4:00
Enter answer here
0
 / 21 guessed
The quiz is paused. You have remaining.
Scoring
You scored / = %
This beats or equals % of test takers also scored 100%
The average score is
Your high score is
Your fastest time is
Keep scrolling down for answers and more stats ...
Medals
Country
121
United States
70
China
67
Great Britain
56
Russia
42
France
42
Germany
41
Japan
Medals
Country
29
Australia
28
Italy
22
Canada
21
South Korea
19
Brazil
19
Netherlands
18
Azerbaijan
Medals
Country
18
New Zealand
17
Spain
17
Kazakhstan
15
Denmark
15
Hungary
13
Kenya
13
Uzbekistan
+9
Level 78
Aug 22, 2016
Happy with NZs 18 medals given our population. Tremendous effort.
+1
Level 50
Aug 22, 2016
Should have had another one at the rugby sevens ..
+7
Level 76
Aug 24, 2016
Here's the highest medals-per-capita quiz, showing (out of the countries in this quiz) New Zealand ranks number one. If we had as many people as the US of A, we would have got 285 golds, 642 silvers and 357 bronzes (worked out by dividing the US population by NZ's population). Since there were roughly 307 of each medal to be won, this would be impossible, something Kiwis manage as a matter of routine. Everyone, would you please now rise.
+1
Level 59
Nov 29, 2020
What would India be?
+6
Level 77
Aug 22, 2016
I was surprised how often I saw Kazakhstan in the finals of various events. I didn't realize that they produced strong athletes. I guess when your only knowledge of the country is Borat, I suppose things may be a bit skewed against reality.
+2
Level 70
Aug 24, 2016
Well they were one of two countries to bid to host the 2022 olympics, (they other being the winner, China. Therefore it can be observed perhaps Kazakhstan takes the olympics more seriously than many other countries.
+1
Level 66
Aug 24, 2016
2022 Olympics? I suspect dodgy tickets for that one.
+1
Level 48
Aug 24, 2016
Aren't Japan hosting 2020? China had them in 2008. 2022 is the World Cup in Qatar!
+1
Level 80
Aug 24, 2016
2022 Winter Olympics to be hosted by China.
+1
Level 63
Aug 24, 2016
They take it more seriously because they bid to host the Winter Olympics? Woudln't that be an argument for every country that ever bid to be a host? And wanting to host takes more than want. After all it is a huge money decision.
+1
Level 48
Aug 24, 2016
Forgot about those! Sorry
+2
Level 57
Aug 24, 2016
If I recall correctly, I think Kazakhstan (and Azerbaijan & Uzbekistan) have a pretty good group of athletes when it comes to weightlifting, boxing, and wrestling, and other such sports.
+4
Level 85
Aug 24, 2016
The ex-USSR countries have maintained the strong sport organizations they inherited when the USSR broke up. And they tend to emphasize individual oriented sports which don't require a great deal of equipment and facilities (e.g. boxing, weightlifting, etc)
+2
Level 64
Aug 24, 2016
@Jiaozira depends what sort of Cricket you mean, 20/20 cricket would work, it only takes about 3 hours per game.
+1
Level 84
Oct 30, 2017
Cricket is awesome! I play it at my local pub all the time! ;-)
+1
Level 54
Aug 22, 2016
For the full list, try this quiz. http://www.jetpunk.com/user-quizzes/153595/rio-olympics-medal-winning-countries
+2
Level 84
Aug 22, 2016
Surprised India doesn't receive more medals. I feel like with 1.2 Billion people, you should accidentally stumble across a few world class athletes.
+5
Level 85
Aug 22, 2016
You would think but there needs to be political will and organization. And making cricket an Olympic sport might help.
+5
Level 70
Aug 24, 2016
Cricket matches last too long for the olympics...
+4
Level 45
Aug 24, 2016
Yeah, it would. In India with 1.2 billion people, there is a lot of competition with education; many colleges only accept students with 95% or above. People nowadays are shifting towards a mentality that education can only get you further in life, which is very true in a sense, but Indian parents are enforcing that on children from a very young age, keeping them slightly away from sports, games etc. There is not a complete stop, but India is an agricultural country, and it is very good to see their progress in not only agriculture, but technology, science, commerce, arts etc. Just sports is getting a little less support from Indians, except cricket, hockey, squash and table tennis, of course! The living standard is getting higher and higher. But now India is getting modernized, so in the future, there will hopefully be a rise in Olympic success by Indians. Every country has it's good and bad points. For India, it's Bollywood, but also pollution. There's technology, but not sports.
+1
Level 82
Aug 24, 2016
Bollywood and pollution? Isn't that two bad points?
+1
Level 71
Aug 24, 2016
As well as some points mentioned, In India there is a lack of facilities for most sports and where facilities exist the general public is unable to meet the costs involved. In USA, Australia, Europe just to mention three areas, there are Swimming Pools in just about every town, Gymnasiums in every town, Football grounds, tennis courts, boxing gyms, golf rinks, sports stadiums, velodromes etc. etc............ It is also financially possible, in those areas mentioned, for just about all young people to take part in any sport they fancy....... All schools have coaching and sporting facilities ...... and there are indoor facilities within easy distance if the weather is against outside practice... If those conditions applied to India it would not be long before their population would begin to raise their standing in world sports.
+1
Level 84
Aug 24, 2016
Just as rugby had to go to their 7s code to make it work for the Olympics (traditional 15s tournament couldn't be done in 16 days), cricket could promote 20/20. I'm not advocating that since 20/20 seems to be little more than a batting contest/home run derby, but it's probably the only way that it happens.
+1
Level 55
Aug 24, 2016
@kalbahamut Perhaps, but at least the former is lucrative.
+1
Level 58
Aug 26, 2016
Even if cricket were an Olympic sport, there would be only 1 or 2 events, so it would do little more than make a dent for the Indians.
+4
Level 76
Oct 7, 2016
Well let's make cricket more than 1 or 2 events then. The bloody swimmers get a squillion medals - swim 100m, 200m, 400m, 800m, 1500m, swim this way, that way, any way and before you know it the medal table is swimming with swimmers. Cricket: 20-overs-a-side, then 18-overs, 16-overs, 14-overs-a-side, one or 2-handed bat holding, mens & womens, left or right handed bowling, 3-stump, 1-stump, 5-stump, with umpires or without them.. that'll get the medal numbers up
+2
Level 71
Jul 29, 2021
Unfortunately the cricket world is incredibly corrupt, and India itself has kinda ruined the chances of cricket becoming an Olympic sport and gaining popularity in other countries. If you've heard of Hasan Minhaj and his (now cancelled) show "Patriot Act," he talked about it once. It's kinda a long video, but if you are well and truly interested in learning more (and are okay with swearing), it's worth the watch.
+1
Level 85
Jul 29, 2021
Don't know a thing about cricket --- and loved the video
+2
Level 63
Aug 24, 2016
Both the US and UK teams were stunningly successful. China seems to be falling a bit.
+1
Level 71
Oct 24, 2020
The US is not that impressive considering the population size. Compared to New Zealand and Denmark, the US should have won 1190 and 885 medals respectively, to have won as many per capita.
+1
Level 39
Aug 24, 2016
Britain really should aim to compete at the top with the US. If you don't aim high, what exactly is the point?
+1
Level 67
Aug 24, 2016
I'm sure they do aim high, but a lot of the summer sports are events in which the USA has been building an infrastructure for decades. That's a lot of ground to make up. Swimming and gymnastics, for example, are events in which the U.S. is usually challenged only by Australia (swimming) and Russia or China (gymnastics). Once in a while, a country finds a generational athlete to challenge, but more often than not, it's about the country's support system for a given sport. The US did especially well this time around because so many Russian challengers were disqualified.
+3
Level 85
Aug 24, 2016
For GB, their success is in part due to the legacy of the London games. Canada had the same boost in Sochi from hosting the winter games, four years prior.

The US has a superb organizational structure in the NCAA. Canadian and Caribbean athletes especially leech off this structure for the support they wouldn't receive at home.

+1
Level 89
Jun 16, 2017
@hwes, Sochi is in Russia, I think you mean Vancouver in 2010.
+1
Level 61
Nov 9, 2020
The UK National Lottery money has made the biggest difference to the British team. Following the humiliation in Atlanta, where we were the poorest performing English speaking nation, in gold medal terms, things had to change. Sports which receive big tranches of lottery money, but fail to produce results at major championships are now punished mercilessly with funding cuts. Athletes and coaches have had to raise their game and the improvements in a number of sports has been startling.
+1
Level 71
Jul 29, 2021
Also, population matters. The US quite simply has a much bigger pool of talent to draw from, which is why our team is almost always the largest at the Olympics. That's also probably a major factor behind China's increasing success at the Olympics as well in recent years.
+1
Level 85
Aug 24, 2016
I'm curious. Who is the girl in the picture?
+1
Level 88
Aug 24, 2016
Katie Ledecky. US swimmer (but not a gas station destroyer).
+1
Level 85
Aug 24, 2016
I wonder if Quizmaster could change it to Penny Oleksiak, a Canadian swimmer (who also doesn't destroy gas stations).
+2
Level 84
Aug 24, 2016
Hopefully no gas station was harmed or destroyed during the creation and answering of these Olympic quizzes.
+1
Level 60
Aug 24, 2016
Medals for East and West Germany should be counted separately.
+3
Level 60
Aug 24, 2016
No time travelling is needed. I'm fine with being in 2016 and not in 1976
+2
Level 67
Aug 24, 2016
Maybe that's fine for you. But what about Disco Stu? Did you even think about him?
+1
Level 38
Jan 23, 2017
This is crazy to see that 75 years after WWII the dominant nations at the Olympics are still the five "winners" (and permanent members of the UN Security Council) and the two "losers" (Germany and Japan).
+1
Level 84
Oct 30, 2017
If Chuck Norris participated in the Olympics as his own country, every country listed above would've gotten shut out!
+1
Level 31
Feb 14, 2018
good for azerbaijan and uzbekistan i would of never of guessed them