Interesting Facts - Page 9

41
Muphry's Law states that anytime you criticize someone's spelling or grammar, there will be a spelling or grammar mistake in your criticism.
42
In the year 1920, there were about 5,000 Amish people. By 2017, their numbers had grown to 318,400. At these growth rates, the Amish population will reach more than 11 million by the end of century. Invest in farmland.
43
Hofstadter's Law states: "It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account Hofstadter's Law"
44
John D. Rockefeller was the first person to have a net worth in excess of $1 billion U.S. dollars. His company, Standard Oil, had a monopoly on the U.S. oil industry.
45
Arsenic trioxide was sometimes known as "inheritance powder" because of its common use as a poison. Rates of poisoning decreased after the invention of the Marsh Test in 1836 which made it possible to detect arsenic in human remains.
+8
Level 66
Apr 22, 2018
Is this new, or have I just never seen this before. It's cool nevertheless!
+6
Level 63
Aug 3, 2021
I'm afraid there is a spelling mistake in #41. Take that, Murphy's Law!
+4
Level 76
Feb 6, 2022
its allmost like that's was the entire point...
+2
Level 56
Apr 6, 2024
It’s spelld “almost”
+1
Level 50
Jul 23, 2022
@McKenzieFam, I’m afraid that there’s a grammar mistake in your sentence
+1
Level 56
Oct 13, 2022
It was two sentences actually
+1
Level 18
May 30, 2023
McKenzieFam That's intentional(I hope).
+23
Level 71
Apr 23, 2018
Sputid fakts
+18
Level 59
Apr 25, 2018
Eye tthank ewe spellt thaht rong.
+14
Level 71
Apr 30, 2018
noeh, i doent thenck soeh !
+9
Level 59
May 4, 2018
Ye, ewer prawbublee write.
+2
Level 40
Aug 20, 2018
So did you.
+8
Level 59
Sep 28, 2018
Joejoex ur funnnee ef thaye dohnt goe write ohvur ewer hed
+9
Level 45
Nov 14, 2018
O mee gaud peepel, wood ewe yist sppel fengs write?
+4
Level 68
May 21, 2020
Noe. Nyevyer!
+1
Level 79
Jul 27, 2020
So did you.
+1
Level 32
Mar 19, 2021
Wee willll nevah sppell iht rite!
+1
Level 46
May 20, 2021
owe nowe, eye hayt sppelng writ!
+1
Level 39
Jun 17, 2021
Oeh! Soh jaubesxe beygan hier?
+1
Level 60
May 24, 2022
Stoopids, it has to be critism
+1
Level 57
Jun 26, 2022
Wy dz nobdy cen raït cretly ?
+1
Level 59
Mar 6, 2023
Ubselitlee nubedi cin reth dhz convurzazhjun
+1
Level 29
Jul 19, 2023
dzis cunviersazchioan ejis reaelyy baed slpeleat!

noen oef yeall’ cen eaven slpel curectalaly!

+2
Level 20
May 19, 2020
no faktcs is raly intrstng dum dumb
+1
Level 58
Apr 7, 2021
oeh reuly... pruev eit!
+1
Level 25
May 25, 2023
I am afraid there is a mistake in your sentence
+28
Level 33
May 13, 2018
Like if you found the error in "Muphry's" instead of "Murphy's".
+1
Level 64
Aug 28, 2018
yeah
+5
Level 74
Oct 7, 2019
Muphry's is spelled correctly, it's 'anytime' witch is wrong.
+2
Level 67
May 18, 2020
*which
+1
Level 74
Sep 15, 2020
Muphry's Law right there, ahahahaha
+9
Level 65
Feb 16, 2021
I think that was on purpose.
+1
Level 56
May 22, 2023
I thought that that was just his name...
+5
Level 75
Jun 29, 2018
If they couldn't detect poisonings until after the invention of the test, how do they know that incidences decreased?
+1
Level 45
Nov 14, 2018
murders and missing cases probably decreased dramatically after finding many cases of poisoning.
+3
Level 75
Jan 30, 2019
People die all of the time and it was far more common to die young, with no readily apparent cause, in the early C19 than we are used to now. I find it hard to believe that there would have been so many murders by poisoning that it made a noticeable difference in death statistics after the introduction of the test.

I wasn't being completely serious anyway, just pointing out what seems to be a logical flaw. I'm sure there are valid reasons why they believe this which I haven't considered.

+1
Level 40
Jun 18, 2021
More people were being killed by old lace after the test...
+1
Level 41
Mar 30, 2023
I imagine when the test was new, a lot of dead people tested +, but more obvious is simple logic that murders would decrease.
+3
Level 65
Jul 18, 2018
The Amish population projection assumes growth rates will stay linear, which is never the case for any population.
+1
Level 71
Dec 4, 2019
At this rate there will be over 21 million Amish in a hundred years. and 1,3 billion by the year 2200 ..... wow!
+8
Level 27
Nov 26, 2018
lol that Murphy's law one
+10
Level 75
Jan 30, 2019
yu've misspelled Muphry's ;-P
+1
Level 85
Feb 21, 2019
yeah
+5
Level 75
Jul 31, 2019
read my post again...
+8
Level 51
Nov 9, 2019
The Amish should relocate to California; there is plenty of farmland, the weather is perfect, and they are used to functioning without electricity.
+1
Level 59
Oct 2, 2020
They live in traditionally german areas, by which I mean places german immigrants moved to. From Pennsylvania to Iowa, all along the rust belt. Plenty of farmland for them, and good quality fruits and vegetables for us.
+3
Level 71
Dec 4, 2019
My favourite Murphy's Law is ......."You never find a lost article until you replace it."
+1
Level 63
Apr 3, 2020
lol so true
+1
Level 55
Oct 6, 2023
*Muphrees
+1
Level 64
Sep 9, 2020
How did we know it was arsenic before the Marsh test?
+1
Level 74
Feb 3, 2021
If Hofstadter's law applies, then the excess time needed would have to tend to a specific value, because otherwise people would never get anything finished, and in fact they do. Therefore, the excess time needed after referring to Hofstadter's law over and over again in a struggle to find out when one will finish will be smaller every time you refer to it. Thus, if you have two similar tasks, and you estimate when you will be finished with it, but also when you will be finished with reference to Hofstadter's law, and then actually do the task and time yourself doing it, then you have three values from which you can calculate for every task, when you will finish it, even with reference to infinite iterations of applying Hofstadter's law. Thus, you will be able to say when you finish the second task.
+1
Level 74
Feb 3, 2021
But the problem with that is, that we would have to apply Hofstadter's law once again, which we cannot do, for infinity plus one doesn't work. Thus I have proven that given the condition that people actually finish stuff at some point, Hofstadter's law cannot work.
+1
Level 39
Jun 18, 2021
*Murphy
+2
Level 56
Oct 13, 2022
joke missed
+1
Level 41
Mar 30, 2023
I spent months deciding to like Acer11818 but i haven't decided yet to make a decision if i am ready to decide . . . i guess i never will
+1
Level 40
Jun 18, 2021
#41 "Muphry's" - nice approach!
+1
Level 41
Aug 26, 2021
Is "Muphry's Law" an example of a Persian flaw, I wonder.
+1
Level 37
Jan 17, 2023
:p
+1
Level 67
Oct 28, 2023
I ran Hofstadter's law on my computer and got a StackOverflowException.
+1
Level 22
Apr 10, 2024
Update on the Amish population: it is now over 367,000 (about 50 thousand extra people in 7 years) this means that the prediction may not be as far-fetched as it may seem.