Take another quiz >
thumb

Biblical Geography

Based on the clue, name these places that appeared in the Bible or in Biblical lore.
Give Up?
Enter answer here
0 / 21 guessed
The quiz is paused. You have remaining.
Scoring
You scored /21 = %.
This beats or equals % of test takers
The average score is
Your high score is
Your best time is remaining
Points
You have earned / 5 points for this quiz
This quiz is not eligible for points
Next Level
/
Keep scrolling down for answers and more stats ...
×
Help

Enter answers in the area marked "Enter answer here".

You can enter any answer, at any time - they don't have to be in order

Punctuation and capitalization don't matter on JetPunk.

Hint
Answer
City of Jesus's birth
City where Jesus grew up
Place that Adam & Eve were
expelled from
Wicked cities that God destroyed
(Lot's wife watched)
City of the Jewish temple
Nebuchadnezzar's empire
Nation afflicted by ten plagues
Sea on which Jesus walked
Sea of Galilee
Two Jewish kingdoms
Hint
Answer
Imperial capital where Paul proselytized
Body of water that parted for Moses
River where Jesus was baptized
Mountain the ark is said to have landed on
City whose walls fell to Joshua's trumpets
Jesus told a surprising story about a
"good" person from this country
Samson battled people of this nationality
Place from which Jesus
ascended to heaven
Mount of
Olives
Island where John wrote Revelation
Mountain where Moses received
the Ten Commandments
Answer Stats
Hint
Answer
% Correct
Your %
+3
level 73
Sep 3, 2013
Got everything except Patmos, never heard of that before. I'm sure I knew all the other answers already but I'm reading through Jerusalem: A Biography right now and most of these places feature. Good read, aside from the beginning being quite repetitive (king A conquers Jerusalem, kills all the Jews, king B conquers Jerusalem, lets them come back, king C conquers Jerusalem, kills everybody, and so on and so on for a couple thousand years)

There are more than two Jewish kingdoms in history and mentioned in the Bible- but still easy to figure out which ones you mean. Also, the Philistines had no nation and I don't think Samaria was ever a country, but whatever. :) Consider your nits picked.
+1
level 73
Sep 3, 2013
Two of these places feature in my oldest cities quiz.
+2
level 71
Sep 3, 2013
Same, all but Patmos. Not bad for a heathen...
+1
level 7
Jun 10, 2014
I know this is a little late, but the Philistines were actually from Philistia....
+1
level 73
Feb 21, 2018
... which was a land full of several tribes constantly warring with one another each with minimal territorial expanse. I wouldn't call that a nation.
+1
level 14
Sep 3, 2013
I wonder if I tried "Sea of Tiberius"? That was the Roman name for the Sea of Galilee.
+2
level 47
Dec 6, 2016
Or Lake of Gennesaret? That's how it was referred to in my current Bible study (when people asked what it was, the leaders said Sea of Galilee). Didn't try it--Sea of Galilee is how it's better known--but just curious if it's accepted.
+1
level 73
Sep 3, 2013
nope. I just checked, that doesn't work. Pretty much of all these places have at least a dozen different names.
+1
level 67
Sep 5, 2013
100% with 2:15 left
+1
level 40
Dec 12, 2014
paul also did at Damascus, so add that for an answer
+2
level 25
Nov 17, 2015
But Damascus was not an "Imperial" city
+1
level 73
Jun 11, 2016
It was from 661 - 744 C.E.
+1
level 36
Oct 3, 2015
lucky for me im currently watching the series "the bible" and it has a lot of the answers in there.
+1
level 57
Oct 4, 2015
It would be interesting to figure out how many of these are true...
+1
level 74
Nov 19, 2015
Most of the places presumably existed. A lot of the events, particularly the New Testament ones, are likely to have occurred. Proving Old Testament events, and matching events to places, is rather more difficult.
+1
level 73
Jun 11, 2016
While the stories are largely fictional or at least fictionalized, most of the places are real enough. Exceptions being the Garden of Eden, of course, and possibly Sodom and Gomorah. There is a real Mt. Ararat in Turkey... however... this mountain was named after the Biblical place and probably not the actual mountain referenced in the Bible, which could have been a different mountain, or could have been entirely made-up, same as the flood story was. Though if the authors of this story had ever seen Mt. Ararat it's possible they were inspired to include it in the story. It is quite impressive to see with your own eyes.
+1
level 74
Aug 7, 2016
I did see an interesting discussion once about how the flood story was likely inspired by a true event. Something about how all the Arabian and eastern Med civilisations have a great flood story in their mythology, so it's quite likely that there was in fact a flood or tidal wave in that region.
+1
level 73
Dec 26, 2016
Considering how often early civilizations sprung up in flood plains (access to flowing water, very fertile soil)... it's not surprising that almost every early civilization also has a story about a catastrophic flood. Most of them predating the Biblical story.
+2
level 53
Apr 27, 2017
The Biblical history was written about, well...history. It's talking about events in the past, so it coming after other accounts of those events doesn't make it null and void.
+1
level 73
Feb 21, 2018
The Biblical story and the other stories that predate it are mythology not history. If they're all writing about the same event then the fact the Bible differs on many important points from these earlier accounts would prove the Bible is not historically accurate. But... they are not history.
+1
level 36
Feb 21, 2018
Did you know that a boat was found right by Mt. Ararat recently? And then scientists drilled down and figured out the boat was the exact proportions mentioned in Genesis. Furthermore, God instructed Noah to construct the ark out of gopher wood. And scientists determined it is gopher wood! It was found frozen under ice, preserved for thousands of years! I think it's so cool to see how we can still find evidence that the Bible is true in the 21st century and also how God preserved the ark just so we could find it years later!
+2
level 73
Mar 1, 2018
eagles fan: I would suggest that from now on you don't trust any information you get from whatever place it was that you read that story. Though, it doesn't sound like the sort of thing you would find published somewhere... my guess is.. anonymous or falsely attributed e-mail forwarded from a family friend?

Archaeology as a discipline was invented by early Christians seeking out evidence to validate their beliefs in the lands where Biblical stories took place. There have been many, many expeditions that set out in search of the Ark. They've found precisely jack and squat. There is no evidence that there was ever a global flood and enormous amounts of evidence that prove beyond any shadow of a doubt this story is fictional.
+1
level 56
Jun 23, 2018
My understanding is that the Garden of Eden is located in Jackson County, Missouri.
+1
level 73
Jun 24, 2018
^according to the Mormons. Muslims place it in Saudi Arabia, somewhere near Jeddah, of course. Just like ancient Palestinians picked out locations for their stories that were known to them.
+2
level 9
Oct 5, 2015
For the two Jewish kingdoms questions, Israel was not a Jewish kingdom. The Jewish kingdom was Judah and from that we derive the word Jew. The Northern Kingdom was known as Israel but also known as Samaria. It's from there that we get the good Samaritan. It's like this, all Jews are Israelites, but not all Israelites are/were Jews. There is still a small small population of Samaritans today.
+1
level 73
Jun 11, 2016
Samaria was the capital of the Kingdom of Israel.
+1
level 27
Oct 6, 2015
I typed Olive heaps of time until I finally added the 's'. Haha silly me.
+1
level 39
Mar 16, 2016
This was easy for me, except for some reason I drew a blank on the question about Solomon. I kept thinking of the Midianites, but I think that was another judge, perhaps Gideon? Anyway, it's a great quiz. Thanks.
+1
level 42
Oct 18, 2016
Olivet should be accepted for Olives.
+1
level 39
Nov 10, 2016
There's always ONE!....
+2
level 63
Mar 3, 2017
Would you be willing to accept "Palestinians" as well as "Philistines"?
+2
level 73
Feb 21, 2018
Definitely not the same thing!
+2
level 34
Aug 7, 2017
I'm not Christian... got 5/21... don't even know why I tried...
+2
level 44
Jan 24, 2018
Philistine singular should be accepted as well
+4
level 39
Feb 21, 2018
Kalbahamut: Vacuous? This coming from someone who throws a hissy-fit whenever anyone has the audacity to disagree with or correct anything he says! - By the way, I would love not to have to read your insolent, self-serving comments except that they flood the comments sections of virtually every quiz.
+1
level 73
Mar 1, 2018
I've never thrown a hissy-fit here but I see you go into histrionics routinely including to make pronouncements that you will make it your life's mission to stalk me around this site and repeatedly leave rude, obnoxious personal attacks against me hoping that some will slip past the censors. I am not audacious. I love it when people disagree with me- if they've actually got good reason to. Prove me wrong and I will thank you for it. I get impatient with people who are needlessly rude, who are condescending without cause (especially when they're demonstrably wrong), who are bigoted with or without reason, or who are just exceptionally stupid. These things annoy me. I've never been annoyed with anyone for disagreeing with me. But I do find you annoying. Yes my comments are self-serving, because I enjoy taking the quizzes and want to encourage people to keep making them, and I also enjoy interacting with those capable of intelligent conversation. They're not meant for you.
+3
level 57
Jun 25, 2018
And of course you're never needlessly rude...
+1
level 73
Jun 27, 2018
Needlessly? Very rarely. If I make an inoffensive statement of fact, someone comes along and says something rude to me in response to this, I might be rude back to them, though.
+1
level 73
Mar 1, 2018
Other people enjoy my comments, too. You're under no obligation to read them. I've been coming to this site basically every day since 2012 and I often comment on quizzes when I take them. Over time the comments accumulate. You've been here for a much shorter time and already I see your comments everywhere.
My comments include constructive criticism for the quiz author, comments on how I enjoyed the quiz or what I found difficult/easy/interesting about it to show the author that the quiz was taken and appreciated, or some anecdote or observation related to the subject of the quiz that I hope will inspire a diverting back-and-forth with someone. And sometimes also a joke.

Your comments, on the other hand, are something like 30-50% nasty, "insolent," personal attacks directed at me. The hypocrisy is staggering.
+2
level 39
Mar 6, 2018
You must be delusional. Every negative comment that I have ever made to you has been in response to your denigrating someone's comment on these quizzes. I have better things to do than go out of my way to insult you. You, on the other hand, seems to relish doing so. Just re-read some of your comments, starting with those above.
+1
level 73
Apr 1, 2018
If you have so many better things to do then go out of your way to insult me, prove it. Literally half your comments are exactly as I described them. and it's pathetic. I've reread all my comments. None of them required you to make it your life's mission to leave undeserved insults directed at me on every single quiz you have taken, which you have openly admitted to doing on other quizzes. Get a life, man.
+5
level 57
Jun 25, 2018
I wouldn't consider all of your comments constructive. You need to go back and re-read some of your comments.
+5
level 16
Jun 26, 2018
Honestly, both of you, (kal AND div), need to watch what you're saying. Go and collect some data on the comments before you come and talk about them here. Seriously. I'm not saying what you guys are saying isn't true, but I do have a hard time believing either one, and I'll tell you why: I still remember one of you specifically (not saying which one, I've had chats with both of you), accused me on a certain quiz of having commented way more than them on said quiz. So I counted. I counted 3 times, and had someone else count. As it was, the one who accused me of having commented way more had 2 more comments on that quiz than me. In other words, they were dead wrong. So unless one of you can go through 500-1,500 quizzes and actually collect data on both your guys' comments, then shut up! Don't talk about things you have no proof of as of yet, on a Bible GEOGRAPHY quiz. Anyway. Sorry for speaking my mind guys. I know that's illegal in some parts of Jetpunk... And the world for that matter.
+1
level 73
Jun 27, 2018
I routinely reread many of my comments. If you don't find them to be as I describe them, you are reading them wrong. Not all of my comments are meant as constructive criticism. Quite a few of them are just meant to make people laugh. Others are simply me commenting about something mundane to show appreciation to the quiz author (basically saying, "hey, someone took your quiz and enjoyed it enough that they felt like commenting on how they did or which questions made them think the hardest, etc."). Some are intended to instigate conversation. Many are meant as constructive criticism or advice, but not all of them.

But I have never formed a vendetta against someone following them around to every quiz I can find them commenting on, and then leaving insults after them, as diva has openly admitted to doing on other quizzes. And as other users have done but won't admit to.
+1
level 73
Jun 27, 2018
Fiddley: I don't need to collect data on anything. The language "something like" makes it clear that I'm not using exact statistics. And whoever was pointing out your hypocrisy for complaining that they were commenting too much, on a quiz where you had commented only 2 fewer times than they had (and, no doubt, had commented more at the time that he left his response)? Sounds like they had a good point.
+2
level 16
Jun 28, 2018
Kal: ~"Quite a few of them are just meant to make people laugh." - Kalbahamut~ You're right. I almost died laughing after reading your 2 comments above. Like, seriously, you didn't get my point at all, did you?
+2
level 47
Apr 23, 2018
Why isn't "Philistia" acceptable for Philistines?
+2
level 32
Jun 23, 2018
Crazy I don't care if the whole world calls me Crazy I don't care if it looks like I've Lost my mind, I'm alive To live a reckless, righteous, foolish life Maybe I was born to be crazy I was born to be crazy Some say, "Strange," Some say, "Odd" I say, "Child of the living God" Some say, "Mad," some say, "Wrong" I say, "Child of the living God" ~Newsboys~
+2
level 60
Jun 23, 2018
Could you accept Philistine for Philistines please?
+1
level 73
Jun 23, 2018
If there were only one of them, David defeating their greatest champion probably wouldn't have been as noteworthy.
+2
level 20
Jun 23, 2018
Ohh nooo.....
+2
level 73
Jun 23, 2018
Extremely easy for this former Sunday School teacher but I enjoyed it.
+1
level 64
Jun 23, 2018
How stupid I feel now. After the first Jesus questions, I read the Adam & Eve one and somehow thought Mary and Joseph. Couldn't get the answer, and when I saw Garden of Eden I also realized my mistake. So note to self; learn to read :P
+1
level 28
Jun 24, 2018
Horeb should be accepted for Sinai. Both names are used.
+1
level 57
Jun 25, 2018
I have visited Patmos (Greek island), it was great. So was Mount Sinai (though it probably wasn't the same Mt Sinai as in the Bible).
+2
level 75
Jun 25, 2018
Would it make sense to also accept "philistine" singular? It seems to fit the question. "This nationality" - philistine nationality.
Similar Quizzes by Tag
×
Congrats!
You have reached a new level
To save this level, you'll have to
create an account
×
Congrats!
You have earned a new badge
To save this badge, you'll have to
create an account