Hadn't you previously changed the name of this quiz to "Countries with the Most International Visitors" or something like that? (which is much more accurate)
This is not really a list of countries that entertain the most tourists. The arbitrary distinction made between tourists that cross an imaginary border that we have socially constructed to be between two countries unrealistically inflates the number of tourists small European countries get relative to larger countries. It makes it so that a family taking the 1 hour train ride from Bratislava to Vienna, even though there is no customs or immigration point between the two, counts more than a family flying 14 hours from Boston to Honolulu. This is non-sensical, EU countries are equivalent to US States when it comes to travel between them, but at least with the previous version of the title you couldn't say the quiz was misleading.
In reality the country that entertains the most tourists in the world is China. USA is #2.
I don't really know what you mean. Yes, European countries do get over-represented because they are smaller, but I don't see any real solution to this. You can't count US states as countries, and you can't count the whole of Europe as one country. I do understand your point about how non-sensical it can be, but on the other hand, you could use reverse scenarios, such as why does entering the USA for an hour from Canada to collect mail, or pick up deliveries, count more than a trip from Paris to Marseille. I really don't see any solution.
Cao: no the point is that it's an almost arbitrary distinction now drawn between different countries in the EU Schengen Area and different states in the USA. It's just as easy to travel between these areas so making one imaginary line count while another imaginary line doesn't count is going to inflate the numbers of areas with more of the 1st kind. If the quiz is about the countries that entertain the most tourists... then it should count all tourists regardless of whether they are international visitors or not. But after several times pointing this out they added a caveat about International tourists and not just tourists. But I thought also that previously they had changed the title.
Geo: no, if you count domestic and international tourists together then China is #1 and the USA is #2. Chinese people are traveling a lot more than they used to and some cities inside China receive staggering numbers of tourists from other places within the country.
That does make sense, and a quiz that counts all tourists would be interesting, although I don't know how you would be able to accurately calculate that. Another question I suppose is how individual countries decide which people are tourists and which are not, which will also affect the figures.
It usually has something to do with looking at hotel registers, etc. Since there's no tracking of people moving around inside the EU and for the most part no border checkpoints for them to cross, they'd be using the same methodology.
Leo: demonstrably untrue. If you counted all tourists regardless of place of origin, then no doubt China would be #1. If anyone is taking a position here out of bias or nationalistic pride, it would be Europeans.
I don't think the national tourists should count. They are simply visiting their own country. That's like saying someone going from New York to Florida counts but not counting a person that takes the train to work everyday. I think you should only count people that are international tourists and go to a country for the sake of going on vacation in that country.
Would a person going to a beach in their own city count as a tourist? I think so, but these numbers are extremely hard to track. It's easier to count international travellers, but it gets hard to separate them from tourists. Unless the data specifically says tourists, which it does seem to, the quiz should be changed to International Visitors or something similar.
India is a great place to visit, not just for the wonderful palaces, forts, monuments etc etc. great food, welcoming people, great weather, marvellous mountains, desert, jungle, savannah ........ you name it, India has it. And I'm not Indian.
India is indeed a great place to visit, but overpopulation and pollution has ruined it. Tourists usually avoid travelling to polluted and overpopulated areas.
I was shocked! Tried it twice... And Fiji...Cambodia...Peru... I
d go to these places before I'd go to South Africa or Ukraine (esp this past year with the war). Egypt surprised me they were still there--Cambodia has ruins without uprisings... Same with Peru, Bolivia and others.
The main tourist areas of Egypt outside of Cairo have barely been affected at all by the Arab Spring and resultant unrest. Sharm has more British people in it than a lot of English Cities!
I think perhaps the majority travel short haul? To travel further is often more costly, and it obviously takes longer.
So Europeans travel mostly around Europe (especially easy with being mostly without borders) making the top destinations Euro centric. Russia goes to Ukraine, US to Mexico and vice versa, China to Singapore etc.
The countries that border India, I imagine, don't have citizens that go abroad for a summer jolly so much.
That's just my guess. I did type in India as a guess, but it kind of makes sense to not be there.
Without borders? Just because Schengen borders don't have barbed wire fences and armed border guards, and thus don't conform to the US idea of what a border looks like, doesn't mean they're not borders anymore.
They're on the list now but ranked pretty low. Having traveled to India as a tourist I'm not really surprised by this. Their visa system is unnecessarily convoluted and difficult. Add to that the fact that they don't really get along with their neighbors and are somewhat isolated from other major source countries of tourists. But if you included domestic tourism they would be higher on the list; for sure they would at least beat out Hungary and the Netherlands.
Would be interesting to see a top 30 list for countries with the most tourists that traveled more than 1,000 or 1,500 miles or so to get there.... I'd wager that countries like Australia, Japan, India, China and Brazil would make such a list. The US, Canada, Mexico, Thailand and other countries would move up in the rankings. The European countries would all move down or shuffle off the list entirely. Would be interesting to see.. but I've never seen anyone try to tabulate this data before.
oh wow, China is already #4 on the above list. Didn't notice. I think on the last version of this quiz they didn't even make the top 30. So, anyway, I imagine that they would move up the list if it excluded people that had traveled less than 1,000 miles. Including domestic tourists I think they're already #1.
@Wombat, I said shuffle down *or* shuffle off. Countries like France would still be on the list, much much lower on it but still on it (take your Midol gandalf), but countries like the Czech Republic and Croatia would likely disappear.
also gandalf, I love how you keep insisting that counting 1 tourist as 1 tourist is "tweaking" the data... when to get the result that you like actually requires ignoring billions of tourists. Whatever helps you sleep at night, mon frère.
I tried Thailand because I hear so much about it. Like India, it has the ancient sights and culture but it has resorts and now medical tourism. People go to scuba dive, lay in the sun and toast in winter. For such a small country, they have a lot of visitors. After all, people don't visit the jungle much, just the capital and ruins and coast.
Thailand is not a small country. It has over 65 million people (more than the UK). It's also surrounded by and near to other countries who also contribute to it's tourism as well as the huge number of tourists visiting from the Western World and East Asian countries.
Though many of those comments have been wiped out now.
Saudi Arabia doesn't really receive tourists. The country does not issue tourist visas. They give out a large number of hajj and umrah visas, but that's not the same thing. Pilgrimage to Mecca is a religious duty not tourism. Saudi shouldn't really be on the list.
Brazil and Australia are very isolated and inconvenient to get to from other major source countries for tourists which are the USA, Canada, Russia, China, Japan, Arabian peninsula countries, and Western Europe. Australia is an island nation with no land borders. Brazil is surrounded by poor countries that don't produce many international tourists with a topography that makes travel between them very difficult. Though if you include domestic tourism then Brazil would probably make the list.
I don't really know where the "Brazil is surrounded by poor countries" thing comes from. Of all the countries that surround Brazil, Argentina and Uruguay actually have higher per-capita GDPs, with Colombia, Suriname, Peru and Paraguay slightly poorer than Brazil but in roughly the same window, and only Guyana, Bolivia and Venezuela being significantly poorer than it.
Saudi Arabia has Mecca. And they are very modern, bring in lots of people. But The Ukraine in the midst of civil war made no sense. UAE shocked me as well. Over Japan, Brazil, Jamaica, Bahamas....so many.
The war is irrelevant. Donetsk isn't a resort town. If anything it has made the country more attractive since the currency devaluation has made it extremely cheap.
Donetsk tourist numbers don't affect the total much, but the loss of Crimea does (even if they tried to count the visitors there and add them to Ukrainian total - the numbers have dwindled from what I hear). And the average tourist avoids a country with a war going on, few bother to check the details. Slovenia had just a very brief war, but for many years it was avoided due to "war in Yugoslavia".
Djilas: that's true. But cyn's comment was overreaching. It's accurate to say that the ongoing conflict in Ukraine might negatively impact tourist numbers, but not that because of this their appearance on the list makes no sense.
Of course, now, things have changed. The entire country is or has recently been under siege including the major tourist centers of Kyiv and Odessa and Ukrainian airspace is closed to commercial flights. They won't be on any such list this year.
No Israel? I tried it but can't see it...Israel with all the Christians and Jewish people visiting as well as Muslims--less than Ukraine in war or Croatia? UAE? ASre there that many rich rich people? Ir is it the young girls kidnapped into prostitution? People reporting the girls being kidnapped from Iraq and Syria are vague about where the brothels are that they keep the young women and girls in...Wonder if UAE is the answer... Men go to religious leaders in towns in Iraq and in refugee camps in and out of Syria and try to bribe them to identify young girls (8 and up) who have lost their male relatives in war. Sometimes, in Iraq, they offer marriage but place the girls in brothels instead. In Syrian refugee camps, they are breaking in at night and kidnapping young women. They are kept in strip clubs and brothels. If families find them, they may be kidnapped right back. Nuns are operating safe houses for girls who have gotten free...hiding and protecting them ...
According to the first google result, Israel got 3.6 million tourists in 2017 which doesn't put it close to making the quiz.
Croatia, Ukraine, and the UAE are popular resort destinations that are close to large populations with disposable income (respectively western/central Europe, Russia, Gulf states). Additionally for UAE, Dubai has become a major transit hub between Europe and Asia -- it has the third busiest airport in the world by number of passengers. The statistics used in this quiz come from UN World Tourism, and while its possible these numbers are counting some of the foreign workers in the UAE that would be workers travelling openly, not clandestinely kidnapped people. Your suggestions also make little geographic sense... I suggest thinking about this critically instead of leaping to sensationalism.
Dubai ( in the UAE) is by far a major tourist destination known for its pristine beaches, super mega shopping malls, sunshine, world-renowned chefs opening up one restaurant after another, dozen world-class golf courses, classy bars, and nightlife, and of course the superlatives i.e tallest, largest, biggest....I can go on. Eco-tourism is another big advantage as are conservation projects along with save-the-planet initiatives. And yes, home to world-renowned Emirates Airlines, Burj Khalifa, Burj Al Arab, etc. People from over 190 nationalities live in peace and harmony with a crime rate of almost zero.
I'm surprised that apparently Singapore the city gets more than twice as many tourists as Singapore the country, according to the two quizzes on the subject on this site.
Findlay, no that would be stupid. Nobody on the site has ever made a quiz like that. You'd have to be unable to read or willfully ignorant to think otherwise.
France has so many visitors because it is a central hub in Europe, e.g. people travelling to other countries in Europe usually pass through France, UK tourists going to Switzerland, Spain, Portugal, Italy, Germany, Denmark, etc etc often arrive first in France then travel on..... it's the same for many other countries.
Extremely inaccurate for some reason. Brasil easily fits in that top 5, whether it's all documented or not. Refuse to believe Australia gets less tourists than half of these countries. Either the source has an inefficient standard for tourism, or their data is flawed.
As has been explained elsewhere, European countries dominate because they're all close together and it is the continent which on average has the most disposable income for travel. If you're in the UK, it's easy to visit France or Spain. From Italy it's a few hours to the Dalmatian Coast in Croatia. By contrast, Australia is a long, long way from any developed countries with large populations. Only NZ and its 4 million people are in easy travelling distance from us, and you still need to catch a three hour flight - unlike in Europe where you can jump in the car or on a train and be in another country in no time. Given all this it doesn't at all surprise me that Australia doesn't make the list. Brazil is a bit more of a surprise, but the countries closest to it have much less disposable income than European countries.
Why is everyone so surprised about Australia? I mean it's remote and far away from the standpoint of most people. If I wanted to get to Australia for example it would take me almost a day to get there including stops cause no plane travels that far without running out of fuel. Expenses probably play a role too. I can see that some countries don't seem like the obvious choice but they are close to other big tourist spots or it's cheap to get there even though they might not be around the corner.
Lol as an Australian, I myself was pretty surprised that Australia was not on here, but I see your point. People from Europe or the US don't want to sit 22 hours on a plane while changing planes once in a while. But with that said, there are a ton of (mostly Asian) tourists here. I am Chinese-Australian too, my parents came here as tourists but eventually moved here as they loved the country so much. But I still want to go to Europe and the USA. But seriously, it is actually pretty beautiful. You should come here at least once in your lifetime :)
Surprised India didn't crack the list, just from sheer numbers, but I suspect the visa process may have something to do with that. Also surprised at Malaysia's high showing--do a lot of Chinese or Australians go there?
I was in Egypt in 2017, and I swear to god we would see a handful of tourists in monuments or museums -yes, even in the pyramids area-, in the cities and hotels we were alone. I've never been a country with a better awesomeness per tourist ratio
FYI Russians are a lot nicer if you can speak Russian. It's a sign of respect. Russia's really not a terrible place to go if you're not an entitled whiner.
I think if you require someone to speak your language before you'll be nice to them, you're not very nice. I've traveled to about 40 countries, speaking at least 30 languages between them - am I really supposed to learn all 30 languages before I travel to those countries? That's obviously not a reasonable expectation. On a quick SE Asian jaunt an Australian might pass from Malay-speaking countries, to Thai, to Khmer, to Lao, to Vietnamese, to Tagalog. And yet in all those countries I've found people very pleasant, regardless of my inability to speak their languages. It's not out of lack of respect that I don't learn their languages - it's that I'm not nearly intelligent enough to become that level of polyglot.
While I am very sad for the Ukraine (I doubt they'll be on this list after later data comes in), I'm so happy for Croatia's recovery. (Game of Thrones has certainly helped!) When I spent a summer there, they were just out of their own war of independence, but NATO was still fighting Serbia. Apparently it had always been a booming tourist destination in the past, but the coast was pretty ghost town-y in 1999. The only tourists who still went were Germans! Aside from one group who had family there (and spoke Croatian), I was the only American I came across. It's a beautiful country, full of warm, gregarious people.
If you actually read the UN report linked at the top, you would see:
Switzerland: 10.4 million
Ukraine: 13.3 million
Croatia: 13.8 million
Croatia and Ukraine might be less famous internationally than Switzerland, but they are very popular beach resort destinations among Europeans and Russians. (France and Spain as well of course, but the first two are closer and much cheaper for many.)
I'm not saying that they should be on here, but I am a bit surprised that the amount of American tourists flooding to Caribbean countries isn't enough to put any on this list. Also since so many people go to Rome, wouldn't that put the Vatican up there?
See my response to FrancisCatherine a bit further down for my educated guess on the lack of the Bahamas. TL;dr: The vast majority of the world lives MUCH closer to superior beaches. Mostly North Americans go to the Caribbean, and we have superior choices there as well.
While North Americans do visit the Caribbean frequently, there is also Florida, Arizona, Nevada, California, etc, while from Northern Europe you really have to leave your country to get somewhere warm. That's my guess as to why.
Depends on what you're interested in and what's convenient. (Austria is closer and much easier travel for most Europeans and probably Americans.)
Morocco got 10.3 million tourists in 2016; Egypt got 5.3 million (this is way down due to security concerns and has likely recovered some in the last two years).
Unfortunately there's no official data, but it's not hard to imagine Vatican City making the list with over 14 million people. That is around 38,000 tourists per day. Sounds like a lot, but if you take a walk around the country it feels like you're about to enter a football stadium. I think it beats the mark easily.
please tell me that i'm not the ony one who is shocked to see hungary and croatia on here but not portugal, indonesia, australia, belgium, switzerland, sweden, brazil, etc.
Croatia and Hungary are both really nice vacation destinations, I've been to both. I guess Europeans are the biggest travelers and these countries are more accessible and reachable than Australia, Indonesia, Brazil etc. for us...
yea hungary and croatia were totally out of the blue for me. Didnt even get those when I started randomly throwing countries about. And also didnt get no indonesia (but malaysia IS there, and not at the end either) And yea sort of expected brazil and australia, yet as stated it doesnt have direct borders, but it is one you hear so many people talking about going to or wanting to go to. Allmost seems to be a set rule, going backpacking when you leave highschool, and if the destination isnt india it is australia. Belgium or sweden wernt ones I would have expected though
Hungary and Croatia are on the list because they are really interesting and nice holiday destinations. Australia is that very large island country that can be found to the West of New Zealand and Indonesia is made up out of a lot of islands and can be found South of China. You are welcome.
They're on the list because they're in Europe where there are tons of tiny countries all next to each other and you don't even need to pass through customs to go from one to the next, and this quiz only counts tourists as tourists if they cross an international boundary.
Brazil is 4th and Indonesia is 7th on the quiz I authored myself on the subject. This quiz includes ALL tourists that a country entertains, both domestic and international, and so in my estimation is more intuitive, but the data is considerably out of date now. I'd update it if I ever found a good source.
Check the quiz source if you actually want to know the numbers. This quiz is counting only international tourists, so European countries get a leg up by being so easy to travel between. This doesn't explain why Hungary (15m) and Poland (17m) > Belgium (7.5m) and Portugal (11m) -- I'm not sure but my guess is that the former two are more popular among Europeans despite being less well known to Americans.
This quiz has so many European countries. Probably because border crossing is easy and flights are cheap between them, especially from Germany and the UK
Europe is squished together compared to other continents with big countries. Not only is border crossing easy within the EU, it's usually a rather short trip and the train system is interconnected.
With all due respect, it amazes and puzzles me that countries like Croatia, Hungary and The Netherlands get more tourists than Brazil, Peru or Australia.
Croatia, Hungary, and Netherlands are all part of mainland Europe, surrounded by countries in close proximity that have lots of people with enough money to travel, and can move easily between countries without needing a visa or plane ticket. Australia needs a plane ticket from anywhere (or I guess a boat, if you want to be whimsical). Brazil has half of the population of South America by itself, and the people of South America (very generally speaking) are less wealthy than the people of Europe. I can also tell you from having traveled through South America myself that it can be a pain. The Andes mountains make road travel a lot more cumbersome than it would otherwise be. There might be an international train system, but I don't recall it. The buses can be pretty good, but the rides are long. I've traveled across both Europe and South America (as a Yank), and it's definitely easier to get around Europe.
For a load of people doing geography quizzes, there are an awful lot of people who can't consider the geographic situation why some of the countries are near the top. The likes of Croatia and Hungary are small countries with lots of other countries very nearby - it's easy to get to them from most of Europe, in a continent that (pre-Covid) is stuffed full of casual travellers, where flights and train travel (and even river travel) is cheap and very convenient. Europe is small and has an excellent transport infrastructure; Peru and Australia are expensive to get to and do not have the numbers of possible travellers in the vicinity in the same way that Europe has.
Also they are relative cheap and beautiful countries:) Croatia has stunning a coastside with Mediterranean villages and Hungary has cities filled with historical buildings and hot springs that attracts many.
It's a small country with lots of other countries nearby - it's easy to get to from most of Europe, in a continent with lots of casual travellers, where flights and train travel (and ever river travel) is cheap and very convenient.
Word is also getting out about its beautiful coastline. Lots of travelers I know want to go there now. It hits all the average travelers' desires: beautiful scenery, modern economy and culture, interesting history, and it seems more exotic than places like France and Italy, which, at least among the millennials I know, seem less interesting because people think they are known quantities (even though people who travel often know how silly that kind of thinking is).
A stay in Croatia is also cheaper than a stay in France or Italy while you get a lot of the mentioned shared qualities. I'm going there for the first time next year.
Ukraine is 25th right now x) I'm so glad we haven't lost too much visitors. Because many people think there's war everywhere in Ukraine but it's absolutely false. It's actually safe in all oblasts, except for Donetsk and Luhansk. So don't be scared to visit Kyiv, Kharkiv, Odesa, Dnipro and Lviv. These cities are so beautiful <3 Especially Kyiv and Lviv. I wish I could visit these cities, but coronavirus limited all my dreams :(
I'm really surprised that Saudi Arabia didn't make the list there's something like 2.5 million Muslims making the hajj to Mecca every year. Similarly, how did Vatican City and Israel not make the list?
This is not just city trips. France has the most campings worldwide if I'm right and in the summer months these are packed but also in spring and autumn these are well visited. It is also a top country for wintersport.
Honestly surprised Bahamas doesn't make the list. It's super close to the U.S. and specifically Florida, where a vast majority of the population is older retired folks with tons of money that love to vacation.
Honestly surprised Bahamas doesn't make the list. It's super close to the U.S. and specifically Florida, where a vast majority of the population is older retired folks with tons of money that love to vacation.
Honestly surprised Bahamas doesn't make the list. It's super close to the U.S. and specifically Florida, where a vast majority of the population is older retired folks with tons of money that love to vacation.
This is not really a list of countries that entertain the most tourists. The arbitrary distinction made between tourists that cross an imaginary border that we have socially constructed to be between two countries unrealistically inflates the number of tourists small European countries get relative to larger countries. It makes it so that a family taking the 1 hour train ride from Bratislava to Vienna, even though there is no customs or immigration point between the two, counts more than a family flying 14 hours from Boston to Honolulu. This is non-sensical, EU countries are equivalent to US States when it comes to travel between them, but at least with the previous version of the title you couldn't say the quiz was misleading.
In reality the country that entertains the most tourists in the world is China. USA is #2.
Geo: no, if you count domestic and international tourists together then China is #1 and the USA is #2. Chinese people are traveling a lot more than they used to and some cities inside China receive staggering numbers of tourists from other places within the country.
Well said
d go to these places before I'd go to South Africa or Ukraine (esp this past year with the war). Egypt surprised me they were still there--Cambodia has ruins without uprisings... Same with Peru, Bolivia and others.
So Europeans travel mostly around Europe (especially easy with being mostly without borders) making the top destinations Euro centric. Russia goes to Ukraine, US to Mexico and vice versa, China to Singapore etc.
The countries that border India, I imagine, don't have citizens that go abroad for a summer jolly so much.
That's just my guess. I did type in India as a guess, but it kind of makes sense to not be there.
Why Brazil, India and Australia aren't on the list?
Saudi Arabia doesn't really receive tourists. The country does not issue tourist visas. They give out a large number of hajj and umrah visas, but that's not the same thing. Pilgrimage to Mecca is a religious duty not tourism. Saudi shouldn't really be on the list.
Brazil and Australia are very isolated and inconvenient to get to from other major source countries for tourists which are the USA, Canada, Russia, China, Japan, Arabian peninsula countries, and Western Europe. Australia is an island nation with no land borders. Brazil is surrounded by poor countries that don't produce many international tourists with a topography that makes travel between them very difficult. Though if you include domestic tourism then Brazil would probably make the list.
.
Croatia, Ukraine, and the UAE are popular resort destinations that are close to large populations with disposable income (respectively western/central Europe, Russia, Gulf states). Additionally for UAE, Dubai has become a major transit hub between Europe and Asia -- it has the third busiest airport in the world by number of passengers. The statistics used in this quiz come from UN World Tourism, and while its possible these numbers are counting some of the foreign workers in the UAE that would be workers travelling openly, not clandestinely kidnapped people. Your suggestions also make little geographic sense... I suggest thinking about this critically instead of leaping to sensationalism.
Switzerland: 10.4 million
Ukraine: 13.3 million
Croatia: 13.8 million
Croatia and Ukraine might be less famous internationally than Switzerland, but they are very popular beach resort destinations among Europeans and Russians. (France and Spain as well of course, but the first two are closer and much cheaper for many.)
Morocco got 10.3 million tourists in 2016; Egypt got 5.3 million (this is way down due to security concerns and has likely recovered some in the last two years).
Panama: 2 million
Monaco: 300 thousand
Cuba: 4 million
Puerto Rico: 3.7 million
Bahamas: 1.4 million
(Vatican city is not listed -- I think the source only counts overnight visitors, and tourists afaik cannot stay in the Vatican overnight.)
South Africa? Portugal? Belgium? Brazil?
Greetings from Central Ukraine!
gosh darn it vietnam....
????????????
Countries most dependent on tourism, Which countries receive the highest percentage of their GDP from tourism?
https://www.jetpunk.com/user-quizzes/1812094/countries-most-dependent-on-tourism