Featured Quizzes
User Quizzes
Create Quiz
Data and Charts
Badges and Games
About JetPunk
JetPunk Shop
Dark Mode
Random Mode
Keyboard shortcut: Command/Ctrl + Shift + R
World Statistics - Up or Down?
Try to guess whether each of these objective statistical measures has increased or decreased since the year 2000.
Rate:
Featured Quiz
Last updated: January 12, 2024
You have not attempted this quiz yet.
More quiz info >>
| First submitted | January 12, 2024 |
| Times taken | 24,190 |
| Average score | 66.7% |
| Rating | 4.44 |
4:00
The quiz is paused. You have remaining.
Scoring
You scored / = %
This beats or equals
% of test takers
also scored 100%
The average score is
Your high score is
Your fastest time is
Keep scrolling down for answers and more stats ...
1.
Life expectancy in Africa
Up
✓
Down
✓
Between 2000–2021, African life expectancy increased from 53.3 to 61.7. Source.
2.
Carbon dioxide in the atmosphere
Up
✓
Down
✓
From 2000–2023, CO2 in the atmosphere increased by about 14%. Source.
3.
U.S. government debt as a percent of GDP
Up
✓
Down
✓
Debt increased from 57% to 121% of GDP between 2000–2023. Source.
4.
Teenage birth rate in the U.S.
Up
✓
Down
✓
The teen birth rate declined by 65% between 2000–2019. Source.
6.
Per-capita European Union CO2 emissions
Up
✓
Down
✓
Per capita CO2 emissions declined by 22% between 2000–2019. Source.
8.
Los Angeles air pollution
Up
✓
Down
✓
Between 2000–2022, the number of "unhealthy" days declined from 175 to 94. Source
9.
Percentage of people living in Germany who were born in a different country
Up
✓
Down
✓
Increased from 11% to 14.9% between 2000–2015. Source.
12.
Number of bald eagles in the United States
Up
✓
Down
✓
No exact source but the increase has been large
13.
Population of Japan
Up
✓
Down
✓
A small decline of 3% between 2000–2024, but the decline is accelerating. Source.
15.
Drug overdose death rate in the U.S.
Up
✓
Down
✓
Increased by over 350% between 2000–2020. Source.
New and Popular
Save Your Progress
Copyright H Brothers Inc, 2008–2024
Contact Us | Go To Top | View Mobile Site
This is entirely due to China, India, and a handful of other countries. Coal production in the developed world has fallen by huge amounts.
The root cause is more speculative.
By "Worldwide deaths due to AIDS," I have to assume the intended stat is the annual number of deaths due to AIDS (or something like that).
Because the way it's phrased, it could be interpreted as asking for the total number of deaths, which very clearly can only have gone up.
In a sense, yes, I'm being pedantic, and you could make the argument that "well, it's clear from context what is meant" but on the other hand: it is a trivia website. "Pedantry? Well gawrsh, Mickey!" Also: it feels like a tiny tweak that's easy to do and won't reset the stats or anything, so why not?
Personally, I think (in the U.S.) we need to rise the child tax deduction to at least $50,000/year per child. That's not a typo. Maybe $100,000/year. We need to encourage our most productive citizens to have WAY more children and small measures aren't going to cut it.
Hungary is trying something similar. It will be interesting to see how it works. In my opinion, the fertility crisis is the #1 or #2 largest issue facing humanity right now (the other being AI).
And for any one taking this opportunity to say OvErPoPulAtIoN no, thats not it, Malthus. World population will decline and the green revolution has kinda been workin so far. Learn DTM. Biggest threat is ai
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2021/11/19/growing-share-of-childless-adults-in-u-s-dont-expect-to-ever-have-children/
While I don't know much about how this stuff work, I'm not sure how effective a tax deduction (even a huge one) would be for the many adults who do not want kids outright. Notably only 17% of the adults who didn't see themselves ever have kids cited financial reasons.
Maybe you wouldn't need to incentivize these people though; maybe such a huge tax deduction would be enough to incentivize those who do have kids to have more, to the extent that the crisis is resolved.
The "fire at will" thing is overstated. Sure, it exists in theory for most non-government jobs. However, in practice, the hassle and expense of litigation means that most professional employers are reluctant to terminate unless it can be done in a litigation-free way like layoffs.
However, if you're working a hospitality or retail job you're pretty screwed.
But European fertility is even worse than the U.S.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_Arms_Limitation_Talks
It has been incredibly successful.
Thousands of nukes were dismantled. In fact, since the 1980s, decommissioned nuclear weapons have been a major source of uranium used in nuclear power plants.
You scored 10/15 = 67%
This beats or equals 47.1% of test takers
The average score is 11
Your high score is 10
Just behind the average