I was deceived by the "evenly divisible" question. I thought you asked for even multiples of 7, thus multiples of 14... Anyway, I think "evenly divisible" is redundant. The notion of divisibility requires that the result is integer...
Updated now. I only added that in anticipation of people complaining that "all numbers are divisible by 7, since you didn't specify the result has to be an integer". Anyway.
In that case, you could also argue that every number is a square number since you can take the square root of every number. But in number theory that is not how you define it, so it is not necessary to mention. PS: you could add some negative values for the multiples of 7 if you want to make it more challenging.
Perhaps "perfect square" is more specific to the squares of integers. Also, one would just have to ignore the minus sign since in that case it is the absolute value that matters
"Divides evenly" and 'evenly divisible" are very common mathematical terms meaning those numbers which are divisible by the number in question (7) and another integer (or whole number).
All was going well until I reached the final question. I've heard of the Fibonacci sequence, but I don't know how it is constructed. Still a very good use of the new format.
Arrgghh, I got one wrong as I chose 9 as having three letters when written out in word form as I believed it was after words with three different letters i.e. 9 has three different letters (N, I, E) whereas it was obviously just asking for three letter words!
EDIT: I took the quiz again and now it was alright. Maybe I just misremembered whether I clicked 2 the first time, I really thought I did though.