Curry is definitely a better player than Harden. But this about win shares, and not opinions. Harden has played ~90 more games than Curry, and has been on playoff teams (OKC and Houston) every year of his entire career.
I suspected that Buck Williams having an edge on Isaiah Thomas was purely longevity, but nope. Buck grabbed a win share every 10.8 games played, and Isaiah only was every 12+. Some combination of rebounding and defense mattering more than ball-handling/playmaking/distributing, quality of teammates actually diluting win share even while increasing gross wins, and/or Buck Williams being underrated/Isaiah being overrated is at play here.
It's based on an objective measurement called Value-Over Replacement Player. It is one of the advanced stats used to compare the quality of players, but certainly isn't perfect (none of them are).
Ginobili was higher ranked in winshares/48, Player Efficiency Rating & Box plus/minus.
i think the top player of the 2009 draft class is stephen curry not james harden...
curry had a better legacy than harden
Ginobili was higher ranked in winshares/48, Player Efficiency Rating & Box plus/minus.