If I was dictator of Bulgaria (Bulgaria, if you're interested, I'm available), here's what I would do.
Every year the fertility rate is below 2.1, I would decrease taxes for parents, and increase them for everyone else. I would massively increase property taxes in desirable city centers for non-parents, but eliminate them for parents. This would make it ultra-affordable for parents to live there, and ultra-expensive for everyone else.
If you have 4 or more kids, all tax benefits are locked in for life.
Universities would be free for people with children and much more expensive for everyone else. First have kids. Then go to college. Not the other way around.
Basically, I'd take all the luxuries that make being childless so amazing, and flip them on their head.
Extreme? Probably. But this is an extinction level crisis for countries like Bulgaria.
Well, one thing to note is that a large reason for Bulgaria's massive population decline is the emigration of Bulgarians to other European countries because of Bulgaria's quite poor quality of life.
Massively increasing taxes for a large part of the population, like you propose, would probably only increase the emigration.
You'd have to raise the standard of living for everyone, so that people would feel secure enough to stay in their country and have children without artificial means like increased taxes.
Emigration and brain drain is hitting the Balkans pretty heavily, ironically worsening conditions and perpetuating the cycle. It's a tough situation to be in.
Speaking of brain drain, I'm surprised there are no quizzes on the subject.
Well, that sounds pretty good, at least at first glance. I even wonder why this is really not used? Most likely, because of the unethical and undemocratic nature, but given the demographic bottom in which Eastern Europe is located, this is better than how they are fighting it now. In Russia, for example, they are trying to fix this with HUGE (by the standards of Russians) money for the first three children, support for large families and heroine mothers. But it's pouring in... unexpectedly, the poorest have a bunch of children for mercantile reasons (at best, a series of loan repayments, and at worst, alcohol for money), get a lot of money, squander it, and then raise a dozen children in terrible conditions. And it ends with the fact that seeing this, children who have grown up in such conditions have at best one child to raise them in proper conditions or do not have them at all. Yes, the vast majority raise children in good conditions, but such families are not unique
On the other hand, this may become economically impractical, because soon the minority will contain the majority (after all, we are trying to have large families?), and then conditionally 80% of the population will be simple freeloaders, which is unacceptable in a capitalist society (in general, the idea of Quizmaster is very similar to the communist strategy). It won't be possible to cancel it once — imagine what would happen if it sent families with an expensive cargo of children on a free voyage? How much discontent there will be, and again, how many dysfunctional families will be formed (and in Eastern Europe and Asia, with their general well-being, there are a lot of people at the social bottom). Therefore, as you clarified, only some dictator can cope with such a bottom (and even China does not have the proper scope for this).
Jamaica's projections must be mostly due to emigration I'd imagine? The birthrate is currently slightly below replacement level but it's higher than for any of the other countries on the list
Migration of many. Many leave between 25 to 45 years old. Plus a significant shift in birth trends: more persons being intentional in their birth control practices - quite noticeable after the announcement of a spike in HIV rate, shops observed increase in contraceptive sales; significant increase in university attendance since around 2005, and Family Planning Board recorded a significant increase in the average age of 1st pregnancy for university graduates for the past decade - they are having kids, just in their 30s and far less kids than before. Then majority of these college graduates are leaving in their late 20s and 30s. Birth rates also took a huge dip during the Zika Epidemic around 2016 onwards
Migrants. Tajikistan, Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan will ensure our growth... excluding migrants from Azerbaijan, Ukraine, Kazakhstan, Belarus, Armenia, Moldova and China, they are insignificant against the background of the first three
Data from real time population for Serbia are incorrect. According to the 2022 census, Serbia had 6.6 million people. And that is half a million people less than in the mentioned data.
Every year the fertility rate is below 2.1, I would decrease taxes for parents, and increase them for everyone else. I would massively increase property taxes in desirable city centers for non-parents, but eliminate them for parents. This would make it ultra-affordable for parents to live there, and ultra-expensive for everyone else.
If you have 4 or more kids, all tax benefits are locked in for life.
Universities would be free for people with children and much more expensive for everyone else. First have kids. Then go to college. Not the other way around.
Basically, I'd take all the luxuries that make being childless so amazing, and flip them on their head.
Extreme? Probably. But this is an extinction level crisis for countries like Bulgaria.
Massively increasing taxes for a large part of the population, like you propose, would probably only increase the emigration.
You'd have to raise the standard of living for everyone, so that people would feel secure enough to stay in their country and have children without artificial means like increased taxes.
At least that's how I see it.
Speaking of brain drain, I'm surprised there are no quizzes on the subject.
red=asia
orange=north america