Most of this happened before I was born, got most of them but did badly comparatively speaking. Probably should have gotten sweaters just on a guess...
Yeah, the question makes it sound like something really memorable. I tried mittens, scarves, knit cap...sweater is so basic that I didn't think it would work, although I suppose if he wore them all the time (like Mr. Rogers), people would associate them with him.
Many of his policies weren't actually bad. People blame him for awful inflation and interest rates - but these were awful before he took office. It was under Carter that the government actually started policies that eventually tamed inflation.
His biggest problem was his slow, methodical, micromanagement style.
100% with 1:47 leftover. I was working my first job after college while Carter was President so I suppose i paid better attention to current events at the time.
And one's opinion about this is an interesting litmus test. In the 1970s, solar panels were very inefficient. Carter putting them on the roof was in some ways a complete waste of money. But they represented an aspiration for a future based on renewable energy. The question is this: Should the government be an agent source of social change or not?
I could be wrong, but I believe they installed solar water heaters, not PV panels. They were pretty darned efficient back then. Maybe not cost effective, but efficient. And once purchased and installed, removing them was a complete and total waste of money.
He's not such a great human being either. Check out his constant praise for Palestinian terrorists, Chavistas, and other assorted lowlifes. He just has a different compass and he follows it to extremes.
IMHO: Carter, Nixon, George W. Bush and Obama had the deck stacked against them from the very beginning of their presidency. They were either dismissed out of hand or demonized for incidents which were either overblown, or not within their power to change; yet not given credit for any successes they may have achieved. I will never forget that the US Hostages held by Iran were conveniently released within hours of Reagan's inauguration... Or that the Iran/Contra scandal happened not long into his presidency. Anyone see nefarious workings there? Yet Carter is vilified as inept while Reagan is hailed as the "great communicator."
Some of what you said here makes sense but, no, I don't think there was anything nefarious about the timing of the hostage release in Iran. Actually this was already negotiated under Carter, before Reagan even assumed office. Though Reagan is usually given credit for it, as if he was so tough that just the thought that he would be president soon made the Iranians lose their spine. He didn't start illegally selling arms to our enemies in Iran until his 2nd term, great defender of American national security that he was.
I think you've conflated a couple of things. North started diverting proceeds from arms sales to Iran to the Contras, starting in Reagan's second term, but the arms sales started in 1981, the very first year of his presidency. Considering that the "cover story" of the arms sales in the former case was that they were leverage for freeing hostages in Lebanon in '86, it smells pretty bad.
As far as I know, it's just a smell, but there's the arms-for-hostages pattern, so it's certainly plausible. If you didn't live through it, it's hard to overstate how much the hostage crisis and the failed rescue attempt convinced many, many Americans that Carter was weak and we *needed* Reagan.
His biggest problem was his slow, methodical, micromanagement style.
I could be wrong, but I believe they installed solar water heaters, not PV panels. They were pretty darned efficient back then. Maybe not cost effective, but efficient. And once purchased and installed, removing them was a complete and total waste of money.
As far as I know, it's just a smell, but there's the arms-for-hostages pattern, so it's certainly plausible. If you didn't live through it, it's hard to overstate how much the hostage crisis and the failed rescue attempt convinced many, many Americans that Carter was weak and we *needed* Reagan.