Here's how I computed the average width of a country. I represented each country as a grid of 2500 points. Then, for each point, I calculated how far you could travel in a straight east-west line without leaving the country. The average width is the average of these distances.
Ah ok, so it is not most western and most easter point. I wanted to suggest to put this in the description, but I see you made a reference...
I always scan the description see if there anything important, no keywords jumped out at me, I skimmed over it (I guess because the sentence is so short and all but the word methodology have no significant meaning, so it didnt register as an important sentence I needed to read fully)
I agree. This quiz, which rates the thinness of countries, regardless of whether they run north-south, east-west, or diagonally, covers all such countries in a single quiz.
I'm not too sure about this methodology as it excludes places such as Panama, which is incredibly wide and not very tall when you view it on a map, but as it's a ~ shape it's not counted :(
I feel like it'd be better to allow the line to pass over the sea so long as it ends up at the furthest away bit of the country at the same latitude, that even excludes the archipelagos in the same way as the original method as it’s unlikely there’s another island at the exact same latitude and if there is, it’d likely get crowded out my all the places where there isn’t another island.
This methodology is flawed in that countries with particularly large bays/inlets that are east/west aligned would have an advantage. Take Guinea-Bissau, which doesn't have very many long north/south lines but does have relatively long east/west lines... but its overall shape is pretty round. By this metric, a C shape would be much wider than it is tall despite that when you look at it it seems very round, or maybe even taller than wide.
Total north/south and east/west expanse would make more sense, and to not conflate countries like the US or France, ignore territories/overseas departments
Same. thought if a Central American country was on the list, it would certainly be this one, so when it didn't work, I didn't even try other countries in this region. Missed Honduras and El Salvador.
Morocco is pretty diagonal, thus making it tall and panama curves quite a bit. North East South West Extremes would over inflate some countries like France and the US.
Yemen and Oman are definitely wider than they are high. Guessing I don't get the methodology here. Lowest point to highest, vs easternmost to westernmost seems most logical...
Your methodology makes sense but would over inflate countries like France or America to giant sizes, because America's Western, Eastern, Southern, and Northern-most points are all in Alaska and Hawaii, and France's Southern-most and Western-most points are in The Caribbean and French Guyana., Also Yemen and Oman are pretty tall by you own methodology, they just orient diagonally.
I really struggled with this quiz - I don't see why some European countries don't get included, despite being obviously horizontal in shape (eg Bulgaria, Austria, Latvia...)
As an example, the distance between the easternmost and westermost point in Austria is roughly twice as long as the distance from North to South (650 vs 300 km), so it should rank pretty high. It's surprising that its neighbor, Czech Republic, gets included despite being "taller" and less wide.
the mythology is different though, using this mythology you might get countries with extremes like Hawaii, Alaska or French Guyana that are not proportionate to the country's general position.
I always scan the description see if there anything important, no keywords jumped out at me, I skimmed over it (I guess because the sentence is so short and all but the word methodology have no significant meaning, so it didnt register as an important sentence I needed to read fully)
I feel like it'd be better to allow the line to pass over the sea so long as it ends up at the furthest away bit of the country at the same latitude, that even excludes the archipelagos in the same way as the original method as it’s unlikely there’s another island at the exact same latitude and if there is, it’d likely get crowded out my all the places where there isn’t another island.
Total north/south and east/west expanse would make more sense, and to not conflate countries like the US or France, ignore territories/overseas departments
As an example, the distance between the easternmost and westermost point in Austria is roughly twice as long as the distance from North to South (650 vs 300 km), so it should rank pretty high. It's surprising that its neighbor, Czech Republic, gets included despite being "taller" and less wide.
Fun idea for a quiz, though.