Take another quiz >
thumb

Least-Forested Countries

Name the countries of the world that have the lowest percentage of forest cover.
Give Up?
Enter answer here
0 / 19 guessed
The quiz is paused. You have remaining.
Scoring
You scored /19 = %.
This beats or equals % of test takers
The average score is
Your high score is
Your best time is remaining
Points
You have earned / 5 points for this quiz
This quiz is not eligible for points
Next Level
/
Keep scrolling down for answers and more stats ...
×
Help

Enter answers in the area marked "Enter answer here".

You can enter any answer, at any time - they don't have to be in order

Punctuation and capitalization don't matter on JetPunk.

%
Country
0
0.006
0.07
0.12
0.22
0.24
0.35
%
Country
0.45
0.48
0.78
0.82
0.90
1.04
%
Country
1.09
1.11
1.21
1.61
1.67
1.88
Answer Stats
%
Country
% Correct
Your %
+4
level ∞
Jun 19, 2017
Nearest misses: Afghanistan, Syria, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, Togo, Maldives, Haiti, Chad, Mali, United Arab Emirates.
+1
level 57
Jun 19, 2017
Wow! Thanks so much for the second feature!
+1
level 73
Sep 1, 2017
I missed ten of the top list but got nearly all of the second. :(
+1
level 48
Sep 1, 2017
likewise!
+1
level 57
Sep 1, 2017
Quizmaster please approve my caveat!
+1
level 68
Jun 19, 2017
0% San Marino seems 'extreme' although I don't know the exact definition of forested area
+1
level 57
Jun 19, 2017
My guess is that there has to be a large enough area of trees to qualify as a "forest" and that San Marino doesn't have enough space for that.
+1
level ∞
Jun 19, 2017
I removed Nauru, Monaco, San Marino and the Vatican after looking at satellite maps.
+3
level 73
Jun 20, 2017
I looked at Vatican City on satellite maps too...I don't think carefully planted trees and gardens count as "forest." I would say that Vatican should still be a big fat zero. Or at least still be on the list somewhere.
+2
level 48
Sep 1, 2017
doesnt matter if it doesnt have enough space, there is nothing in the description about that! so you removed legitimate answers therefore this quiz should not count towards the points system...
+1
level 62
Sep 1, 2017
I tried "Vatican" "The Vatican" "Holy See" and every other combination I could think of. I haven't been there but I assume the Pope takes his walks through acres and acres of rolling forests...
+2
level 72
Sep 1, 2017
hm... yeah... I circumabulated the entire country of the Vatican and did not see a single forest.
+1
level 53
Nov 8, 2017
I do like the fact that if we're counting planted trees as forest, Vatican's number rises by ~0.0045% every Christmas when they put up the Vatican Christmas tree.
+1
level 63
Jun 22, 2017
Surprised Mali doesn't make the list.
+1
level 57
Jun 22, 2017
Looks like it's one of the nearest misses
+1
level 49
Sep 1, 2017
San Marino with 0% forrest
+1
level 57
Sep 1, 2017
See above comments
+3
level 61
Sep 1, 2017
Some of us don't read the comments before we take quizzes. Are you going to put the list of exceptions up top or do you plan on just replying to people with "see above comments"? ;)
+1
level 57
Sep 1, 2017
There's no point in bringing up the same argument again and again when it has been mentioned many times above. As a general rule you should just read comments before you type yours so you don't state something twice.
+2
level 62
Sep 1, 2017
you should readd San Marino, Monaco and Vatican, at least. No forrest and barely no trees at all in thoses places...
+1
level 57
Sep 1, 2017
See above comments
+1
level 53
Sep 1, 2017
Maybe Vatican?
+1
level 57
Sep 1, 2017
See above comments
+2
level 62
Sep 1, 2017
Hey, have you seen the comments?
+1
level 59
Sep 1, 2017
A planted tree does not constitute a forest. Vatican needs to be back on the list!
+1
level 57
Sep 1, 2017
WHY DO I ALWAYS MISS JORDAN?!?!?!?!?!?
+1
level 51
Sep 1, 2017
what about Greenland? I see data from 0 to 0.00054
+1
level 57
Sep 1, 2017
Not a country
+1
level 72
Sep 1, 2017
Shocked about Pakistan. How does a large country with one of the worlds great river basins have that little forest? Especially considering none of it's neighbors are on the list. Did Pakistan at one time have forests and they got cut down?
+1
level 66
Sep 1, 2017
Please keep in mind the source, the UN FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). I've worked for some years on issues involving ag stats, enough to know that theirs are a running joke (as is the organization in general).
+2
level 62
Sep 1, 2017
Since Haiti is notorious for its overforestation, I'm really surprised it wasn't here (even though it just missed the list anyway)
+1
level 57
Sep 1, 2017
I tried most of these secondaries. I missed Malta, but really why does two fortress islands count but not a city block (Vatican) or a fully urbanized island (Singapore)? Or Nauru, which is just completely mined dead. I also missed Lesotho, I felt that was quite a strange one to be non-forested.
+2
level 70
Jan 19, 2018
Look at the satelite photos, Singapore island is not fully urbanized.
+2
level 63
Sep 2, 2017
Surprised not to see Namibia or Australia. Granted I've never been to either, it seems they're always portrayed as mostly desert wastelands. Also interesting fact: Iceland was 97% forest when first settled, but has now fallen to below 0.5% due to deforestation
+1
level 57
Sep 6, 2017
Australia has an enormous desert in the middle, but there's significant rainforest in the north as well. The whole scale of the place is crazy.
+1
level 39
Sep 3, 2017
vatican, monaco, no forest
+1
level 59
Sep 6, 2017
Confused that vatican, singapore and monaco not included. I kept thinking I had spelled them wrong. Would be nice if it was in the instructions that cities or certain countries are eliminated for whatever reason.
+1
level 56
Sep 10, 2017
I didn't even think of those countries for some reason--just focused on desert countries. But I agree that they should either be included or there should be a note in the description telling us that they are excluded.
+1
level 57
Sep 10, 2017
First there wasn't a caveat, then I added one, then it got taken away. We can't please everyone.
+1
level 23
Oct 16, 2017
Nice! Wasn't easy.
+1
level 67
Nov 14, 2017
Just please add the Vatican, Monaco, Nauru, and San Marino back. There is no reason whatsoever for them not to be on here. And yes, I read the above comments, and have yet to see a reason as to why they were removed.
+1
level 70
Jan 19, 2018
Just look at the satelite photos ... No idea where FAO gets the data from, but it's clearly wrong in this case:

Nauru - clearly more than 2% forest, here are also some photos from the ground

San Marino - mostly houses and farmland, but also plenty of trees in between and also a few larger patches

Monaco - dubious IMO, there is apparently some steeper land with trees, but I don't think it reaches 1.88% without counting the parks ...

Vatican - it does seem to include also some forest. Wikipedia says: Today's Vatican Gardens are spread over nearly 23 hectares (57 acres), they contain a variety of medieval fortifications, buildings and monuments from the 9th century to the present day, set among vibrant flower beds and topiary, green lawns and a 3 hectares (7.4 acres) patch of forest.
+1
level 70
Jan 19, 2018
3/44 ha = 6.8% in Vatican
+1
level 49
Feb 12, 2018
0,006% in Oman? So how tiny is the forest there. It must have less than 10 trees.
×
Congrats!
You have reached a new level
To save this level, you'll have to
create an account
×
Congrats!
You have earned a new badge
To save this badge, you'll have to
create an account