Hint
|
Answer
|
things to consider when evaluating electoral systems
|
proportionality and vote value
|
.
|
stable government
|
.
|
constituency link
|
.
|
extension of voter choice
|
.
|
promoting participation
|
.
|
comprehensibility and transparency
|
worst for proportionality
|
FPTP
|
eg 2019 conservatives
|
won 77 more seats than proportion of the vote
|
best for proportionality
|
List PR
|
eg 2019 european elections brexit party
|
39% of the vote and 40% of the seats
|
why is STV best for vote value
|
minor parties can affect final outcome
|
FPTP is good for strong government however it did produce in recent years,
|
coalition 2010 and minority government 2017
|
worst for strong governemnt
|
PR tends to produce multi party government
|
best for constituency link
|
FPTP
|
which system also does have constituency links, but just over larger areas
|
STV
|
constituency link is undermined anyway by what?
|
party whips
|
why is FPTP best for transparency and comprehensibility ?
|
clear simple straightforward efficient
|
worst for transparency and comprehensibility as complicated multiple rounds
|
List PR/STV
|
2007 Scottish Parliament Elections- new electoral systems produce unnecessary complications
|
3.5% of ballots filled in incorrectly
|
but its the governments responsibility to?
|
educate the electorate
|
2015 pressure group created campaigning against FPTP
|
make votes matter
|
number of elected representatives is calculated by the number of votes actually received
|
proportional representation
|
candidates with the highest number of votes in each constituency is elected
|
majoritarian system/ winner takes all
|
what does PR make much more likely?
|
coalition government
|
electoral systems used in the UK - FPTP
|
general elections
|
party list system
|
european elections
|
AMS
|
scottish parliament/ welsh parliament
|
STV
|
Northern Irish Assembly
|
AV
|
select committee chair elections
|
2019 Lib Dems won how many seats under FPTP?
|
11
|
but could have won how many if AMS had been used?
|
79
|
2019 SNP won how many seats under FPTP?
|
48
|
but could have won how many under AMS?
|
26
|
this is an example of?
|
winners bonus
|
which other parties are also routinely overrepresented?
|
labour and conservative
|
eg 2005 labour
|
35% of the vote and 55% of the seats
|
no government in recent years has formed with over 50% of the?
|
popular vote
|
2019 green party won how many votes compared to seats?
|
865,000 votes 1 seat
|
but could have won how many seats with AMS?
|
38
|
how many votes were wasted in 2019
|
22 million
|
an instance where a right wing candidate is elected because of a split liberal vote
|
progressive tragedy constituencies
|
so voters may resort to?
|
tactical voting
|
1997 amount of conservative seats lost due to tactical voting
|
50
|
the need for tactical voting proves FPTP is?
|
undemocratic
|
open list systems allows for (eg for centrists who dont like their more left wing labour candidate)
|
a choice of candidates from the same party
|
1983 labour won 2.2% more votes than lib dem, but how many more seats?
|
186
|
97-10 lib dems were getting what percent of the vote?
|
23%
|
2019 what percentage of vote did not affect the final representation in parliament?
|
71%
|
this does not meet what concept?
|
one person one vote one value
|
where in Europe is FPTP used?
|
only the UK
|
VOTING BEHAVIOUR
|
why people vote the way they do
|
key changes in voting behaviour
|
class dealignment
|
.
|
partisan dealignment
|
.
|
more swing votes
|
.
|
rise of identity politics
|
why may people choose to vote for a particular party
|
leadership
|
.
|
manifesto pledges
|
.
|
media influence
|
.
|
demographic factors
|
.
|
rational choice
|
.
|
competency
|
modern labour and conservative parties are?
|
reasonably ideologically similar
|
so the median voter may focus on?
|
salient issues that vary by election
|
2010 salient issue
|
economy
|
2015 salient issue
|
immigration
|
2017 salient issue
|
brexit
|
valence issue
|
an issue that is unanimous
|
eg
|
economy/healthcare
|
why were Labour 'unelectable' from 2010-20
|
corbyn considered unreliable on the economy
|
shows that people consider not only the competency of the whole party, but also the?
|
reliability of the leadership
|
salient issues vary over time, as does consideration given to them by the main parties, so gives third parties the opportunity to focus on a specific issue, eg
|
UKIP on immigration
|
eg
|
green party on the environment
|
partisan dealignment may lead to an increase of
|
floating voters
|
2010, what percentage of votes went to parties other than labour/tory
|
35%
|
peter pulzer
|
"in british politics, class is everything, all else is embellishment and detail"
|
how did people vote post war
|
working class voted labour middle class voted tory
|
what happened from then?
|
class dealignment
|
john prescot
|
"were all middle class now"
|
1974 - what percentage of the middle class voted tory?
|
56%
|
compared to 2010?
|
39%
|
what also dictated social class in the 70s?
|
occupation
|
in the 70s what percentage of unskilled workers voted labour?
|
60%
|
compared to what in 2010?
|
40%
|
traditional working class industries heavily impacted by?
|
thatcher
|
diminishing traditional working class is because of the?
|
embourgeoisement of society
|
reasons
|
higher access to education
|
.
|
increased affluence
|
.
|
changes in labour market
|
.
|
fewer trade unions
|
.
|
privatisation
|
this is why the middle class is now the main target for both main parties- and traditional working class have become?
|
left behind voters
|
eg labour has done what
|
distanced themselves from the trade unions
|
geographical demographics- what happened in 2019?
|
collapse of the red wall
|
showing the subsequent collapse of what?
|
core voter bases
|
in 2019, the middle classes tended to gravitate towards?
|
labour
|
class used to be the best predictor of voting trends- what is it now?
|
age
|
young people have the lowest turnout- what was it in 2019?
|
47%
|
why?
|
more likely to be dealigned
|
who tends to vote for labour?
|
young people
|
.
|
women
|
.
|
ethnic minorities
|
what did YouGov estimate about older people voting Tory?
|
2019 the chance of a person voting Tory increases 9 percentage points every 10 years of age
|
perhaps this indicates that voting behaviour for older generations is more?
|
entrenched
|
s. popkin - people take
|
information shortcuts
|
so look to other sources as people dont trust politicians such as,
|
opinion leaders
|
.
|
social media
|
.
|
celebrities
|
also a significant predictor of voter behaviour is?
|
education
|
labor voters tend to be?
|
university educated
|
qualities of top political leaders
|
communication (conveying what you stand for)
|
.
|
experience
|
.
|
policy (building policy that is linked to party values but appeals broadly)
|
.
|
opportunity
|
.
|
adaptable in crisis
|
.
|
resilient
|
example of good, clear communicators
|
thatcher (strident and aggressive)
|
.
|
Blair (good public speaker)
|
examples of bad communicators
|
Brown (bad infront of cameras)
|
.
|
May (parroted strong and stable but no clear policy communication)
|
examples of ministerial experience
|
Johnson was london mayor and foreign sec.
|
|
Major was foreign sec. and chancellor
|
example of no experience
|
corbyn was just a backbencher
|