This Marxist sociologist calls surveillance technology 'technologies of power' or 'disciplinary technology':
-He suggested surveillance was a key means of monitoring, controlling and changing the behaviour of criminals.
-He saw surveillance as a form of disciplinary power, as the fear and uncertainty of whether or not they were being watched would encourage people to internalise surveillance and exercise self-surveillance and control their behaviour through self-discipline or self-control.
-He sees surveillance extending across many institutions in contemporary society, and penetrating ever more into every sphere of life, including the private aspects of our lives.
-He argued contemporary society has been transformed into a surveillance or disciplinary society, in what he called the 'age of panopticism' in which everyone is subject to the disciplinary gaze of the panopticon.
-The use of 'technologies of power' or 'disciplinary technology' has become a means for the state and other institutions to exercise disciplinary power and control by casting the net of surveillance over the entire population.
-He used the concept of a 'carceral archipelago' (prison consisting of a series of islands) to describe contemporary societies, with every public location like a small panopticon in which everyone is subject to surveillance.
-He argues that due to this, we live in a 'carceral [prison-like] culture' - in modern society, everyone is watched so everyone is potentially a 'suspect'.
-Those with power have become the 'judges of normality' who watch us and impose conformist behaviour through self-discipline, to prevent and undermine any threat to social order through crime and disorder, and indeed any deviant behaviour.
-Thus, surveillance has become an oppressive form of social control.
Evaluations:
-There is so much surveillance that we are unaware of it most of the time - especially with the use of the internet and social media.
-Many people will make choices to act despite the surveillance.
-The lack of surveillance in more deprived areas means that crime is just displaced.
-Some surveillance can be useful, for example for monitoring hospital patients, or for reducing crime and social disorder in communities where it is a real problem.
-Evidence suggests those living in the most deprived communities that suffer the greatest harm from crime and disorder welcome surveillance cameras as improving their sense of safety, as well as reducing crime in their neighbourhood.
-Surveillance also appears to be of growing assistance in the fight against terrorism and the threats it might pose to public safety, though some regard this as a convenient excuse by the state to undermine civil liberties and justify ever-increasing levels of surveillance over everyone.