Sociology: Criminal Justice System

This is the first quiz based on the Criminal Justice System, as part of the AQA A-Level Sociology Specification. Below are the words which need to be matched to their definitions: Michel Foucault (1991) Criminal Justice System (CJS) Phillips & Bowling (2003) Lammy Report (2017) 92.6% David Lyon (2009)
Quiz by billyn
Rate:
Last updated: February 18, 2024
You have not attempted this quiz yet.
First submittedFebruary 18, 2024
Times taken3
Average score83.3%
Report this quizReport
10:00
Enter answer here
0
 / 6 guessed
The quiz is paused. You have remaining.
Scoring
You scored / = %
This beats or equals % of test takers also scored 100%
The average score is
Your high score is
Your fastest time is
Keep scrolling down for answers and more stats ...
Answer
Hint
Criminal Justice System (CJS)
This is a collective term given to institutions responsible for delivering justice in the UK:
-Comprises the police, Ministry of Justice, Home Office, Courts, Crown Prosecution Service, Serious Fraud Office, Prisons.
-Functionalists argue it serves the people by upholding the norms, values and laws of society.
-Marxists argue that it reflects the interests of the Ruling Class and seeks to defend those interests.
Phillips & Bowling (2003)
These sociologists suggest the CJS operates on processes and procedures that disadvantage minority groups.
92.6%
In April 2019, this was the percentage of court judges who were White.
Lammy Report (2017)
This report found that 25% of those in custody were from ethnic minority groups.
David Lyon (2009)
This sociologist argues that surveillance - which he defines as 'focused attention to personal details for the purposes of influence, management or control' - in technologically advanced societies has been enhanced and amplified by information and communication technologies (ICTs):
-He emphasises that 'in addition to those who may be "suspects" (because of committing alleged offences) ordinary persons in everyday life - workers, consumers, citizens, travellers - find that their personal data are of interest to others' and that everyday life has become less 'private' and that ordinary people have become more vulnerable to monitoring and intrusion.
-He suggests that surveillance has become so pervasive and such a routine and inescapable part of everyday life in technologically advanced contemporary societies that it now makes sense to talk of 'surveillance societies' in which ICTs enable total social control.
Michel Foucault (1991)
This Marxist sociologist calls surveillance technology 'technologies of power' or 'disciplinary technology':
-He suggested surveillance was a key means of monitoring, controlling and changing the behaviour of criminals.
-He saw surveillance as a form of disciplinary power, as the fear and uncertainty of whether or not they were being watched would encourage people to internalise surveillance and exercise self-surveillance and control their behaviour through self-discipline or self-control.
-He sees surveillance extending across many institutions in contemporary society, and penetrating ever more into every sphere of life, including the private aspects of our lives.
-He argued contemporary society has been transformed into a surveillance or disciplinary society, in what he called the 'age of panopticism' in which everyone is subject to the disciplinary gaze of the panopticon.
-The use of 'technologies of power' or 'disciplinary technology' has become a means for the state and other institutions to exercise disciplinary power and control by casting the net of surveillance over the entire population.
-He used the concept of a 'carceral archipelago' (prison consisting of a series of islands) to describe contemporary societies, with every public location like a small panopticon in which everyone is subject to surveillance.
-He argues that due to this, we live in a 'carceral [prison-like] culture' - in modern society, everyone is watched so everyone is potentially a 'suspect'.
-Those with power have become the 'judges of normality' who watch us and impose conformist behaviour through self-discipline, to prevent and undermine any threat to social order through crime and disorder, and indeed any deviant behaviour.
-Thus, surveillance has become an oppressive form of social control.

Evaluations:
-There is so much surveillance that we are unaware of it most of the time - especially with the use of the internet and social media.
-Many people will make choices to act despite the surveillance.
-The lack of surveillance in more deprived areas means that crime is just displaced.
-Some surveillance can be useful, for example for monitoring hospital patients, or for reducing crime and social disorder in communities where it is a real problem.
-Evidence suggests those living in the most deprived communities that suffer the greatest harm from crime and disorder welcome surveillance cameras as improving their sense of safety, as well as reducing crime in their neighbourhood.
-Surveillance also appears to be of growing assistance in the fight against terrorism and the threats it might pose to public safety, though some regard this as a convenient excuse by the state to undermine civil liberties and justify ever-increasing levels of surveillance over everyone.
Comments
No comments yet