Statistics for Criminal Law: Sexual offences cases

Click here to take the quiz!

Hint	Answer	% Correct
Rape myths	Evans (Chedwyn) (2016)	29%
S.76 Irrebuttable presumptions: Purpose, webcam.	Devonald [2008]	14%
S.75: Conditional consent.	Julian Assange v Sweden [2011], F v DPP [2013]	14%
Lie about fertility.	Lawrence [2020]	14%
S.75: Violence.	Lewis Mba [2012]	14%
S.76 Irrebuttable presumptions: Purpose, no payment.	Linekar [1995]	14%
S.76 Irrebuttable presumptions: Nature, music teacher.	Williams [1923]	14%
S.75: Voluntary intoxication.	Bree [2007]	0%
Mens Rea: Reasonable belief.	DPP v Morgan [1976]	0%
Intentional inducement, impersonation of boyfriend.	Elbekkay [1995]	0%
S.76 Irrebuttable presumptions: Nature, posed as surgeon, faked surgery to have intercourse.	Flattery (1877)	0%
S.76 Irrebuttable presumptions: Nature, sent letters as police officer.	Jheta [2007]	0%
Penetration as continuing act.	Kaitamaki [1984]	0%
S.75: Unlawful detainment.	Larter and Castleton [1995]	0%
Gender identity	McNally [2013]	0%
Intentional inducement, undercover officers in environmental activist group.	R (Monica) [2018]	0%
S.76 Irrebuttable presumptions: Nature, consent with HIV positive person.	R v B [2006]	0%
S.79 'touching' definition.	R v H [2005]	0%
Mens rea: Intoxication caused belief in consent.	Woods [1982], Fotteringham [1988]	0%