1. Different angles of photos are a part of the challenge. All tanks are perfectly recognisable
2. I'm aware of that, but requiring a specific variant of a Panzer III or IV would be too hard for most people. Panzer IV with a short barrel is still a Panzer IV
3. The terms "Porsche turret" and "Henschel turret" are considered incorrect. Again, both of those variants are still a Tiger II.
First of all, in the description I said tanks and fighting vehicles. And even if it didn't say that, Puma is as close to a tank as you can get, an armored vehicle with a large caliber gun. It's not tracked, sure, but I didn't give you a Kübelwagen or a Kettenkrad, the purpose and usage of Pumas is identical to how you would expect of a light tank. Being pedantic about this sort of thing doesn't make you look knowlegdable in this matter.
I agree with knuranonim the puma is a light tank which fits all description of a tank, it would be acceptable to assume the puma a armoured vehicle if it were open top but even if it was it still could be considered a tank. Also when is the last time you saw an armoured car that looked like that!!!
2. and the Panzerkampfwagen IV A,B,C,D and E only had the short barrel
3.there were two differents types of the Tiger II because they had different types of towers. P for Porsche and H for Henschel
2. I'm aware of that, but requiring a specific variant of a Panzer III or IV would be too hard for most people. Panzer IV with a short barrel is still a Panzer IV
3. The terms "Porsche turret" and "Henschel turret" are considered incorrect. Again, both of those variants are still a Tiger II.