home
Menu
Create
Random
0
0
0

Criminal Law: Actus Reus and Mens Rea cases

Save time by using Keyboard Shortcuts
Quiz by samparkin92
Rate:
Last updated: February 2, 2024
You have not attempted this quiz yet.
More quiz info >>
First submittedFebruary 2, 2024
Times taken2
Average score26.7%
Report this quizReport
Quiz and answer stats >>
Friends stats >>
4:00
0
 guessed
15 remaining
The quiz is paused. You have remaining.
Scoring
You scored / = %
This beats or equals % of test takers also scored 100%
The average score is
Your high score is
Your fastest time is
Keep scrolling down for answers and more stats ...
But for test, gave dying mum poison.
More than de minimis: Drug dealer.
More than de minimus, car chase with friend, D's conduct need not be 'principle or substantial cause of death'
Blameworthy cause, learner driver was not to blame as V was at fault for accident.
Operating cause, train accident, took up rails.
Thin skull rule: pre-exisiting physical conditions.
Thin skull rule: pre-existing religious beliefs.
Intervening acts: fight or flight.
Third party: started chain of events.
Third party: Died to antibiotic which was allergic to.
Three pronged test: didn't put out fire that they started
Subjective recklessness: Stole gas meter to get money that caused gas leak in another house, killing inhabitant.
Objective recklessness: Drunkenly set fire to hotel, said that drunk danger top others did not cross his mind.
Return to subjective recklessness: Kids set fire to newspapers, set bins alight and then a shop.
Indirect intention.
Caldwell [1982]
Cato [1976]
Cheshire [1991]
Cunningham [1957]
Hughes [2013]
Jordan [1956]
Kimsey [1996]
Master (Jitesh) [2007]
Miller [1983]
R v Benge (1865)
R v Blaue [1975]
R v G [2004]
R v White [1910]
R v Woollen
Roberts [1972], Marjoram [2000]
Comments
No comments yet
Save Your Progress

Copyright H Brothers Inc, 2008–2024

Contact Us | Go To Top | View Mobile Site