About the New Blog Update

+10

Context

Yesterday, on Oct. 13, Stewart posted a blog about a new update to blogs (Link). It had three major changes. The first was a change in requirements to post blogs. Now, users must be at least level 40, and also must have been on the site for at least 6 months. The second allows users to disable comments on their content, and the third clamps down on toxicity on the site by banning users who spread hate.

Blog Requirements

For me, I am lucky to be able to avoid this. When I read the blog by Stewart, my first thought was "Wait, I might not be able to post blogs anymore" which is pretty bad for me, since I was planning on releasing a new blog soon. Fortunately, I've been on the site longer than I expected, at 8 months, and I am level 58, allowing me to still post blogs.

However, this isn't that good for other users. The example I am going to use is MiecraftMan. I'm sure a lot of you reading this blog knows about him, since he (pretty sure it's a he, given the "Man") regularly posts blogs. In addition, he is level 52, well above the 40 level minimum. However, he has been on the site for only 4 months, meaning he has to wait another 2 months to be able to post blogs again. I am going to assume that he was planning on continuing to post blogs, since he's been posting them regularly since August (if you want to correct me, MiecraftMan, please comment on that). He also does not post spammy blogs, and they often are quite interesting.

I am aware that this restriction to blogging was created to reduce the number of "spam blogs", or low-quality blogs, and I can understand where it is coming from. My suggestion would be to get rid of the requirement to have been on the site for 6 months, but still keep the level 40 requirement. This is since level 40 is quite hard to get to, and one has to have stayed on the site for a while to have gotten to it anyways. To me, the time requirement seems sort of redundant, but Stewart, Quizmaster, if there was any other reason to include it, please express it in the comments.

Comment Disabling

I don't really have much to say about this. I think this is a good idea, especially if some of the more popular creators on the site don't want repeating comments saying "Good quiz" or "Good blog" filling up their notification box. It could also prevent comments that are rude or toxic. Of course, the downside of this would be that the creator doesn't get any feedback or suggestions, so if there were a mistake, that creator would never know.

I do have a question about this though. Say there was a blog with several comments on it, and the creator decided to disable comments without deleting the previous ones. Would the previous comments still be shown, or not?

Toxicity Bans

This one I agree with, of course, since toxicity should never be treated lightly, and spreading hate is never okay. However, I do hope that this ban is used unbiasedly, although it is hard to think of a possibility in which there is a hate comment that Quizmaster would choose not to ban the user who posted it based off of his own preferences.

My other worry is that this ban might branch off later on, and lead to greater and greater moderation of the site. As long as the bans only apply to users who are toxic, however, I am good with it.

+1
Level 43
Oct 14, 2021
And I also have a question. Stewart and Quizmaster can disable the comments of my quizzes, blogs, or charts, for example? I think so, right?
+1
Level 60
Oct 14, 2021
Yes.
+1
Level 68
Oct 14, 2021
Yes, if they so choose.
+4
Level 60
Oct 14, 2021
To answer your question at the end of CD, no. All the comments will be hidden. I am not yet sure if they get deleted, or just hidden until the restrictions change.
+2
Level 68
Oct 14, 2021
I'm pretty sure they don't get deleted, so I guess they just stay hidden. Thanks!
+3
Level 68
Oct 15, 2021
Correct, if you disabled comments for a day then enabled them again all the comments would still be there afterwards.
+2
Level 65
Oct 14, 2021
Interesting thoughts... I was also thinking about the same things with the restrictions.
+3
Level 34
Oct 14, 2021
Haven't been on here for a while. I'm sad, I can no longer edit or create any blogs. I just hope my blogs aren't deleted.
+2
Level 34
Oct 14, 2021
Although I do understand this update, and even though I don't like it, I think it was needed.
+1
Level 75
Oct 14, 2021
I think all you've lost is just the ability to post blogs temporarily, your blogs are still up
+1
Level 68
Oct 15, 2021
Correct, blogs of users who are not eligible will not be deleted.
+1
Level 39
Oct 14, 2021
Same
+1
Level 38
Oct 14, 2021
I dont want to get banned but in my opinion, level 40 restriction is like not letting the privilege's of blogs to people who aren't smart. It seems kind of unfair. Nice idea though.
+2
Level 68
Oct 14, 2021
Well, I think that's sort of the point with the restrictions. It prevents those without enough experience from writing low-quality blogs that fill up the RUB page. Of course, there are users who are below level 40 and have been on the site for less than 6 months who have the ability to write high-quality blogs, which is why I want to get rid of the latter. The first one sort of makes sense, but then again, there are always exceptions. It's sort of like a teacher punishing an entire class for the actions of 90% of the students, at the expense of the 10% who were innocent. Unfortunately, I don't really think there's any way to resolve this, unless users can somehow appeal to QM or Stewart to bypass this rule, which I doubt would work. The only option, therefore, would be for those good bloggers beneath level 40 to grind points until they can write blogs again, which is far from ideal, but is the price to pay, I suppose, for tidier and higher-quality blogs overall.
+3
Level 75
Oct 14, 2021
The idea of the level 40 limit is probably to leave writing to the more knowledgeable and active users as well as to encourage others to learn more and use the website more. So, theoretically speaking, it would probably improve the overall quality of blogs.

Imo, though level 40 is pretty high for some, it is still fairly lenient. You have to grind about 180 featured quizzes from level 30, and most of that can be done by searching for flags, countries, cities, borders, etc. quizzes in the untaken section of the user stats page.

+1
Level 60
Oct 14, 2021
me willing to pay big money for a time machine
+6
Level 75
Oct 14, 2021
Also, you won't get banned for posting an opinion that is not pure toxicity, don't worry lol
+1
Level 40
Oct 15, 2021
What about the MG17? He's below level 40

;)

+1
Level 43
Oct 15, 2021
On total level I’m above 40 :)
+13
Level 68
Oct 15, 2021
To clarify. The increase to level 40 is simply because getting to level 30 can be done in about half an hour on a new account, and this was how several users in the past created alt accounts to post more blogs. The points to get to level 40 are just over double that of level 30.

Also, level 40 users are more familiar with JetPunk itself, and so are more likely to be respectful of its community and to not commit toxic behaviour.

The 6 month requirement, while drastic, is absolutely necessary. It is already in place for user spotlight, and it makes sense here too. Why should a new user who been on the site 2 hours but grinded to level 40 be able to create blogs? It's a massive flaw that has allowed inexperienced users to create bad blogs and often cause problems. By forcing users to be on JetPunk 6 months we eliminate the alt problem and weed out the spam users who can't be bothered to wait that long.

+12
Level 68
Oct 15, 2021
Of course, I am sorry to those like MiecraftMan, but at the end of the day waiting a couple months is a small price to pay compared to what restrictions could have been implemented. We discussed many options, one of which was disabling user blogs all together, but the result is a compromise which solves many issues while keeping blogs alive and a healthy place to be.
+4
Level 63
Oct 15, 2021
Very well done Stewart, I don't think any of us would want the RUB deleted.
+1
Level 66
Oct 15, 2021
Is it possible to add a moderator override for the 6 month requirement?
+1
Level 68
Oct 15, 2021
For what purpose?
+5
Level 60
Oct 15, 2021
I guess I never thought to much about the level 30. I just figured all those spammy blogs were from level15 users who just never and seen the RUB. I think tho that I will be able to post late November, so I’ll wait without complaining.
+1
Level 66
Oct 15, 2021
True, I can't see a lot of use except for MiecraftMan's (and other users under 6 months) case.
+2
Level 68
Oct 16, 2021
Thank you for answering, Stewart! Very well written as well. Also, sorry I wasn’t able to reply sooner than I had intended; yesterday was a very busy day.

I think your argument makes sense, and I agree that new users who are unfamiliar to Jetpunk, as well as users who simply spam blogs should be weeded out. However, I still think 6 months is a bit too long. Not sure how you did your calculations, but if we assume that a user aces every quiz they take (which is quite unlikely), and they take an average of 4 minutes each quiz, I found that it would take a little over 10 and a half hours to get to level 30. Using the same calculations, it would take a little over 22 and a half hours to get to level 40.

Assuming the user spends 4 hours on Jetpunk per day, which is quite a lot, it would take 5 and a half straight days of grinding to get to level 40. I'm pretty sure any new user wouldn't do that, but let's assume that's what happened, and they are very dedicated to Jetpunk.

I would...

+1
Level 68
Oct 16, 2021
...guess the average spammy blogger probably would be too lazy to put in that much effort. However, if they were, they would have to wait 6 months to post blogs. If they were so determined to post spam blogs to get to level 40, they probably would be able to wait 6 months. Like I said, though, most spammers would most likely be turned away just from the level you have to reach to post blogs.

That brings me to the 6-month requirement. Yes, I now see that it is probably good to have a time requirement to post blogs. However, I still do think 6-months is a bit drastic. Even before the update, spammy or low-quality blogs weren’t that common in the RUB, and in those that were, other bloggers were quick to correct them.

The half a year wait to be able to post blogs, I think, could easily be overcome if the spammer in question simply moved to other blog sites to spam blogs, and then returned 6 months later to do the same here. However, like I said, I now do think a time requirement is...

+1
Level 68
Oct 16, 2021
...necessary to weed out the really impatient spammers, and at least thin out the herd. I was thinking maybe 3-4 months should suffice.

Ultimately, though, it is not up to me to choose what happens here on Jetpunk; that would be for you and QM to decide. I can respect the new requirements that you made, and I also understand why you made them. My blog above was simply stating my opinion and suggestions, but I was also fully aware that you were not likely to change the requirements. That is okay. Thanks for the feedback, Stewart, and I look forward to more updates for Jetpunk in the future.

+1
Level 39
Oct 15, 2021
Ill be able to post in a long time maybe march?
+1
Level 68
Oct 15, 2021
About mid February for you
+1
Level 38
Oct 15, 2021
Darn. Say goodbye to me *cries*
+1
Level 60
Oct 15, 2021
Grind to level 40 its much easier for you to meet the requirements than me
+1
Level 44
Jan 25, 2022
You are 3 levels off of level 40! Don’t quit just yet :)
+1
Level 51
Oct 15, 2021
Personally, I don't like the new blog update... my Stewartbanningmeophobia and Quizmasterbanningmeophobia have both gone into remission...
+3
Level 65
Oct 15, 2021
i support stewart. level 40 is much easier than 6 months
+3
Level 65
Oct 16, 2021