Featured Quizzes
User Quizzes
Create Quiz
Data and Charts
Badges and Games
About JetPunk
JetPunk Shop
Dark Mode
Indian Penal Code (IPC) Quiz 2
This quiz covers the concept of "Common Intention" as given under Chapter 2 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
Rate:
Last updated: January 19, 2022
You have not attempted this quiz yet.
More quiz info >>
| First submitted | January 19, 2022 |
| Times taken | 9 |
| Average score | 68.8% | Report this quiz | Report |
10:00
The quiz is paused. You have remaining.
Scoring
You scored / = %
This beats or equals
% of test takers
also scored 100%
The average score is
Your high score is
Your fastest time is
Keep scrolling down for answers and more stats ...
1.
Common Intention means:
Similar intention
✓
Sharing of Intention by All persons involved
✓
Same Intention
✓
Common Plans
✓
2.
When a criminal act is done by several persons in furtherance of common intention of all each one of them is liable:
as if it was done by each of them in singular capacity
✓
only for the part each one has done
✓
for abetment to commit the act
✓
for an attempt to commit the act
✓
3.
The Principle of Common Intention applies only when:
At least 1 person is involved
✓
At least 5 persons are involved.
✓
At least 2 persons are involved.
✓
None of the options
✓
4.
The expression 'Common Intention" is defined under which Section of IPC?
Section 32
✓
Section 33
✓
Section 34
✓
Section 35
✓
5.
The phrase "in furtherance of common intention of all" used in the definition of 'Common Intention' was
in the original draft
✓
added by Amending Act of 2018
✓
added by Amending Act of 1986
✓
added by Amending Act of 1870
✓
6.
To establish "Common Intention" under the IPC:
Only the common intention has to be proved and not the overt act
✓
The common intention and overt act both have to be proved
✓
Common intention need not be proved but the overt act has to be proved.
✓
All of the Options.
✓
7.
Which of the following is a leading case with respect to "Common Intention"?
Dedar Nath v. State of West Bengal
✓
K.M.Nanavati v. State of Maharashtra
✓
Niharendu Dutta v. King Emperor
✓
Barendra Kumar Ghosh v. King Emperor
✓
8.
Which one of the following is not an ingredient of "Common Intention" under the IPC?
in furtherance of common intention
✓
Similar intention of those who involved in the crime.
✓
Criminal act done by several person
✓
meeting of the minds of those who involved in crime.
✓
9.
In which of the following cases did Lord Sumner said, "they also serve who stand and wait"?
None of the Options.
✓
Inder Singh v. Emperor
✓
Barendra Kumar Ghosh v. Emperor
✓
Mehboob Shah v. Emperor
✓
10.
To impose joint liability under Section 34 of the IPC, the prosecution needs to prove:
Intention
✓
Common Intention
✓
Same Intention
✓
Similar Intention
✓
11.
What is the the difference between Section 34 and Section 149 of the IPC?
Section 34 and Section 149 create specific offences.
✓
Section 34 creates a specific offence whereas Section 149 does not.
✓
Section 149 creates a specific offence whereas Section 34 does not.
✓
No Difference.
✓
12.
Mehboob Shah v. King Emperor is a leading case on:
Similar Intenstion
✓
Common Intension
✓
Conspiracy
✓
Common Object
✓
13.
In which case did the Privy Council make a distinction between "Common Intention" and "Similar Intention"?
Barendra Kumar Ghosh v. Emperor
✓
Shrinivasmal Barolia v. Emperor
✓
Mahboob Shah v. King Emperor
✓
Bannu Mal v. Emperor
✓
14.
Which of the following recognizes the principle of vicarious criminal liability under IPC?
Both Section 34 and Section 149
✓
Section 149
✓
Section 34
✓
Non of the options.
✓
15.
'X' armed with a loaded pistol and 'y empty handed go to 'Z' shop in furtherance of their common intention to commit robbery, 'X' enters the shop and on being resisted in carrying away property shoots 'Z' with pistol. 'Z' dies at once. For what acts of 'X', 'Y' is liable :
Dacoity with Murder
✓
Dacoity
✓
Robbery and Murder
✓
Robbery
✓
16.
X and Y go to murder Z. X stood on guard with a spear in hand but did not hit Z at all. Y killed Z. In this case:
Only Y is liable for the murder of Z
✓
X and Y both are liable for murder of Z
✓
No offence
✓
X is not liable as he did not hit Z.
✓
Comments
No comments yet
New and Popular
Save Your Progress
Copyright H Brothers Inc, 2008–2024
Contact Us | Go To Top | View Mobile Site