home
Menu
Create
Random
0
0
0

Criminal Law: Secondary Liability cases

Save time by using Keyboard Shortcuts
Quiz by samparkin92
Rate:
Last updated: February 21, 2024
You have not attempted this quiz yet.
More quiz info >>
First submittedFebruary 21, 2024
Times taken1
Average score28.6%
Report this quizReport
Quiz and answer stats >>
Friends stats >>
4:00
0
 guessed
14 remaining
The quiz is paused. You have remaining.
Scoring
You scored / = %
This beats or equals % of test takers also scored 100%
The average score is
Your high score is
Your fastest time is
Keep scrolling down for answers and more stats ...
Removed the doctrine of joint enterprise liability from English law: an accessory must have intended to assist in the commission of the principal offence, and not merely have foreseen it.
Gave laudanum to third party, put on mantel, another third party gave it to son who died. Innocent agent used.
Accessory to buggery, excited dog...
Forced wife to have sex with friend, 'if she struggles she likes it', friend did not know.
Prize fighting, consent for injury is not defence.
Pestered hitman to kill ex-husband, accessory to murder
Father and son in fight, killed someone, accessory to manslaughter as assistance can be given without knowledge of primary offender.
Added alcohol to drink without knowing, accessory to drink driving. Need not be 'meeting of minds' for procurement.
E drove D's car dangerously with D in the car. Power of control rule.
Counselled Z to murder, Z decided not to but went berserk and killed anyway. No need for causal link.
Stood and watched as woman raped. Mere presence not enough for aiding.
Hid in caravan to muder, decided not to, but murdered anyway. Accessory only needs foresight of possibility that principal offence will be committed.
Allowed truck to carry excessive load. Appealed on basis had no motive to aid. Ruled that motive was irrelevant.
Supplied oxygen cutting equipment. One must have knowledge of type of principal offence that would be committed.
AG's Reference (No.1 of 1975) [1975]
Du Cros v Lambourne [1907]
National Coal Board v Gamble [1959]
R v Bainbridge [1960]
R v Bourne (1952)
R v Bryce [2004]
R v Clarkson [1971]
R v Cogan and Leak [1976]
R v Coney (1882)
R v Culheim [1985]
R v Fury [2006]
R v Jogee [2016]
R v Luffman [2008]
R v Michael (1840)
Comments
No comments yet
Save Your Progress

Copyright H Brothers Inc, 2008–2024

Contact Us | Go To Top | View Mobile Site