Statistics for Equity: Investment and Delegation Cases

Click here to take the quiz!

General Stats

  • This quiz has been taken 0 times
  • The average score is 0 of 10

Answer Stats

HintAnswer% Correct
Breached duty by feeling obliged to take the first, lower, offer on a property.Buttle v Saunders [1950]
0%
Trustees can take their own views into account or the views they believe beneficiaries would take.
Mine workers pension scheme.
Cowan v Scargill [1985]
0%
'Investment' does not have a precise legal meaning.Dominica Social Security Board [2008]
0%
Ethical investment strategy allowed due to the nature of the trust.Harries v Church Commissioners for England [1992]
0%
Alternate ethical investments allowed as long as they are as valuable as others.Martin [1988]
0%
Need to prove causal link between breach and relevant loss.Nestle v National Westminster Bank [1994]
0%
Beneficiary not allowed to occupy property as needed rental income from a third party.Re Power's Will Trust [1947]
0%
More specific duty of trustees when appointing an agent.
Example of prior to 2000.
Re Vickery [1931]
0%
Defined the meaning of investment.
To employ money in the purchase of anything from which interest or profit is expected.
Re Wragg [1919]
0%
Prudent business man standard.Speight v Gaunt (1883)
0%

Score Distribution

Percentile by Number Answered

Percent of People with Each Score

Your Score History

You have not taken this quiz