Hint | Answer | % Correct |
---|---|---|
Breached duty by feeling obliged to take the first, lower, offer on a property. | Buttle v Saunders [1950] | 0%
|
Trustees can take their own views into account or the views they believe beneficiaries would take. Mine workers pension scheme. | Cowan v Scargill [1985] | 0%
|
'Investment' does not have a precise legal meaning. | Dominica Social Security Board [2008] | 0%
|
Ethical investment strategy allowed due to the nature of the trust. | Harries v Church Commissioners for England [1992] | 0%
|
Alternate ethical investments allowed as long as they are as valuable as others. | Martin [1988] | 0%
|
Need to prove causal link between breach and relevant loss. | Nestle v National Westminster Bank [1994] | 0%
|
Beneficiary not allowed to occupy property as needed rental income from a third party. | Re Power's Will Trust [1947] | 0%
|
More specific duty of trustees when appointing an agent. Example of prior to 2000. | Re Vickery [1931] | 0%
|
Defined the meaning of investment. To employ money in the purchase of anything from which interest or profit is expected. | Re Wragg [1919] | 0%
|
Prudent business man standard. | Speight v Gaunt (1883) | 0%
|
Copyright H Brothers Inc, 2008–2024
Contact Us | Go To Top | View Mobile Site