Roman Numerals Explained

+15

Introduction

The Roman numeral system originated in ancient Rome and spread all over Europe with the expansion of the Roman Empire. But it remained confined only to Europe. Elsewhere in the world, other systems were being used.

One such system was the Hindu numeral system, developed in India. It was introduced to Europe by the Arabs, thereby giving it the misnomer "Arabic numerals".

By the fifteenth century, the usage of Roman numerals had almost discontinued and was largely replaced by the Hindu-Arabic numerals and with the Age of Discovery, it spread to the Americas, Africa and Oceania.

But for this blog, we will be focusing on the Roman system, its fundamentals and working, the problems found in this system and also some lesser-known features.

So let's begin!

How does the system work?

The modern Roman numeral system consists of seven letters. They are:

I      V      X      L      C      D      M
which respectively stand for 1, 5, 10, 50, 100, 500 and 1,000.

How those letters came to represent these numbers is a story for another time.

Let's try to understand how the system works.

The seven numbers mentioned above are the backbone of this system and can be considered as the "primary" numbers. So what if you want to write a "non-primary" number, like 286?

The system follows what in mathematics is called a subtractive notation. It basically means that you add the larger number and then subtract the smaller number from the beginning.

Let's take an easy example: the number four.

One way to write it is to add one four times, giving us the clumsier but easier to understand notation of IIII.
Another way is to subtract one from five, both of which are primary numbers, giving us the shorter, easy to distinguish but a little harder to understand notation of IV.
The latter method explains subtractive notation: IV = 5 – 1 = 4. The smaller number (which is in the beginning) "I" is subtracted from the larger number "V" to give us a value of 4.
On clocks, you might often see 4 written as IIII (see thumbnail of the blog). The reason behind it is not certain, but one theory says that the Romans avoided using IV on clocks because it was also the initial letters of Ivpiter, the Latin spelling of Jupiter.

So you get the basic idea of how this system works. Now let's take a look over some other numbers.

Let's convert 286 to the Roman system. We'll do this step-by-step.

First, we will convert 200 to the Roman system. Just think about it, 200 is two times hundred, right? And hundred is a primary number. You can add a hundred to another hundred to get two hundreds.
200 = 100 + 100 = 2 × 100 = CC
The second step will be to convert 80. The standard way is to add three tens to a fifty, since both ten and fifty are primary numbers.
80 = 50 + 10 + 10 + 10 = 50 + (3 × 10) = LXXX

The non-standard (and also a nonsensical) method is to subtract 50 from 100 and then add three tens to it.

It makes no sense because 50 is already a primary number, so there is no need to subtract it from 100, another primary number.
80 = 50 + 10 + 10 + 10 = (100 – 50) + (3 × 10) = LCXXX

Now, this is not an incorrect notation, per se, but it is just not standard. It is almost certainly legal!

The final step is to convert the number 6. It is one unit larger than 5. So we can add 1 to 5, both of which are primary numbers, to get a 6.
6 = 5 + 1 = VI
So, finally 286 can be written as:
200 + 80 + 6 = CC + LXXX + VI = CCLXXXVI

Some other examples for different numbers:

1776
= 1000 + 500 + 200 + 50 + 20 + 6
= 1000 + 500 + (2 × 100) + 50 + (2 × 10) + 5 + 1
= M + D + CC + L + XX + V + I
= MDCCLXXVI
2023
= 2000 + 20 + 3
= (2 × 1000) + (2 × 10) + (1 × 3)
= MM + XX + III
= MMXXIII
3428
= 3000 + 400 + 20 + 8
= (3 × 1000) + (500 – 100) + (2 × 10) + 5 + (1 × 3)
= MMM + CD + XX + V + III
= MMMCDXXVIII

Problems of the Roman Numeral System

Let's now take a look at some of the problems posed by this system. One of the most peculiar aspects of the system is the several ways one can write a number in.

Take 999 as an example. It can be written in four different ways, all of which are legal, but only one of which is standard:

CMXCIX = (1000 – 100) + (100 – 10) + (10 – 1)
LMVLIV = (1000 – 50) + (50 – 5) + (5 – 1)
VMIV = (1000 – 5) + (5 – 1)
IM = 1000 – 1

The first notation is the standard while the others are legal but not standard.

See how there are four different notations for a single number? Also observe their lengths. The first two (including the standard) are 6 letters long while the other two are only 4 and 2 letters long.

This brings us to our next problem. Consider the numbers 1000 and 4899.

1000 = M
4899 = MMMMDCCCXCIX

While in the Hindu-Arabic numerals, both the numbers are exactly four characters long, but in the Roman system, 4899 takes up 12 times as many characters as it takes for 1000.

Let's move on to the next peculiarity: the absence of zero. The Roman system is well-known for not having the zero.

Zero acts as a placeholder. It doesn't have any value on its own but it changes the value of other digits. Take 160 as example. How would you say it in English? One hundred and sixty or one sixty or some other regional thing that I might not be aware of.

Anyway, you get the point. There is no need of zero when you write 60 as LX.
Anyway, they eventually figured out that to write all of the digits, they needed something to represent the "nothingness" or zero, the Latin word for which was nulla. Finally, N came to represent "zero" or "nothing".

And for our last peculiarity, there are some examples of years after 1000 CE being written as a combination of two numbers between 1 to 99.

1613, for example, was found to be written as XVIXIII which would literally translate to sixteen thirteen. Remember that the standard way to write it is MDCXIII.

Oh and also I found this beautiful chart online showing the character lengths of all Roman numerals until the number 250.

Observe the stairway kind of pattern formed and how the local maxima in all the five cases are formed by numbers ending in 8, that is because of the one-digited numbers, 8 takes up the largest number of characters.

Chart sourced from DataGenetics

Fractions

You might say, um... what? Believe me, that was my reaction as well.

The Romans had a notation for 1/2 as well.

It was denoted as S but wait for it, it wasn't really 1/2 but 6/12 because 12 is a multiple of both 3 and 4, thereby making it easier to handle common fractions like 1/3 and 1/4.
Other fractions were denoted with the combination of dots (·).

Here's a list of all fractions:

1/12 = ·
2/12 = 1/6 = :
3/12 = 1/4 =
4/12 = 1/3 =
5/12 =
6/12 = 1/2 = S
7/12 =
8/12 = 2/3 = S:
9/12 = 3/4 = S∴
10/12 = 5/6 = S∷
11/12 = S⁙
12/12 = 1 = I
So if you want to write "7 and half" you will do so by writing VIIS and "100 and two-thirds" as CS:.

There are some other fractions as well, all of which are multiples of 12. I will not be showing them here because they would probably make this blog overcomplicated and your brain hurtful. If you still want to know about them, you can find them here.

Apostrophus

Back in those days, numbers larger than 5000 were rarely used. But we need notations for them as well!

One such way to write large numbers was the apostrophus.

In this method, 500 was written as IↃ (this is from where D was obtained) and 1000 as CIↃ (which could have eventually straightened out to give an M).
Basically, each additional set of C and enclosing CIↃ raises its value by a factor of ten.
CIↃ = M = ↀ = 1000
CCIↃↃ = ↂ = 10,000
CCCIↃↃↃ = ↈ = 100,000
IↃ = D = 500
IↃↃ = ↁ = 5000
IↃↃↃ = ↇ = 50,000

As you can see above, some of the numbers had additional symbols as well.

Vinculum

The final feature that we will be talking about is vinculum, in which any letter was multiplied by 1000 by adding an overline.

Let me explain with an example:

In the standard way, 10,000 would be written as MMMMMMMMMM. But as you can see, it's quite long and also confusing.
The vinculum method is to add an overline or a horizontal bar over the letters to multiply it by 1000.
10,000 = X = 10 × 1000
Some other examples:
999,000 = CMXCIX = 999 × 1000
123,000 = CXXIII = 123 × 1000
4000 = IV = 4 × 1000
50,000 = L = 50 × 1000
Another way was to enclose the letters between two vertical bars to multiply them by 10.
10,000 = |M| = 1000 × 10
6900 = |DCXC| = 690 × 10
47,000 = |MMMMDCC| = 4700 × 10
Combining both the overline and the two vertical bars to get a three-sided box would multiply any number with 100,000.
XII = 13 × 100,000 = 1,300,000
CC = 200 × 100,000 = 20,000,000

Modern use

Even though Hindu-Arabic numerals are superior in every nature to the Roman numerals, it is still used in a wide range of fields and applications.

One of the most popular usage of Roman numerals is as ordinals, which denote rank or position.

Think of monarchs such as Charles III and Louis XIV or rockets such as Saturn V.

George V, with the V marking that he was the fifth British king named George; 1916 coin from India
July IV MDCCLXXVI marked on the Statue of Liberty symbolising the independence date of the United States

The next time you read a book, before skipping the preface and introduction pages, take a look at the format the page numbers are printed in.

Sporting events are also usually denoted with a Roman numeral ordinal.

In astronomy, a planet's natural satellites are given the official designation in the format of [Planet's name] followed by [Roman numeral]. So Phobos is "Mars I" and Deimos is "Mars II".

In inorganic chemistry, an element's oxidation number is always mentioned in Roman numerals.

In legal fields, laws, codes and amendments are all organised by Roman numerals.

And finally, perhaps, the most significant usage of Roman numerals in modern times is by the Romance languages, like French XVIIIe siècle and the Spanish siglo XVIII, both of which mean the "18th century". This feature is also found in some Slavic languages.

A shop in Lithuania showing the business hours, with I marking Monday and VII marking Sunday
A road sign from Italy where IX over 17 marks 17.9 km

So that was it! A short informational, educational and mathematical blog about the Roman numeral system.

In some recent developments, I have found myself falling more and more in love with mathematics, statistics and data visualisation, and other fields of applied mathematics.

It has been more than 7 months since I released my last blog. With this blog, I hope to return to blogging, but I'm afraid I still won't be as active as I used to be back in pandemic era.

Hopefully, this blog could be expanded to a series about the sheer beauty of mathematics.

And on that note, I conclude this blog. Goodbye! 👋

+5
Level 66
May 16, 2023
Oh? An interesting informational blog? Haven't seen one of those in a while. Great job, Afishyonahdoe.
+2
Level 60
May 16, 2023
A fishy on a doe
+1
Level 50
May 17, 2023
490
+1
Level 73
May 16, 2023
Thanks Nickelz!

Yeah educational tag has been so rarely used.

+3
Level 74
May 16, 2023
I liked the chart about the length of roman numerals!

And who would've known there's so many other little features about Roman Numerals that we never hear about!

+2
Level 73
May 16, 2023
Thanks cathlete! (Your Eurekas of Mathematics had been a great source of inspiration and interest for me, lately.)

Indeed, so many features that didn't make the cut and have fallen into disuse. :(

+2
Level 74
May 16, 2023
Thank you for your kind words!
+5
Level 59
May 16, 2023
Finally, an AFC BLOG
+3
Level 54
May 16, 2023
Great blog! The first parts are pretty commonly known and conventional (but obviously needed in a blog like that to cleverly introduce the subject), but the rest of the blog was pretty interesting. I didn't even know how fractions work, and I have to agree with cathlete: the chart used is very interesting.

Honestly, that's not a problem at all if we have to wait several months between two consecutive blogs if they are of this quality.

+1
Level 73
May 16, 2023
Haha thanks for the kind words Baptiste! 😊

That chart is definitely the cherry on the cake for this blog.

+2
Level 63
May 16, 2023
It's gorgeous, as always! It's great to finally see your blog
+1
Level 73
May 16, 2023
Thanks kingsfisher for the everlasting support! :)
+2
Level 59
May 16, 2023
Great blog!
+2
Level 59
May 16, 2023
Why is it CMXCIX as standard instead of IM? Roman Numerals are very much harder than they need be
+2
Level 73
May 16, 2023
Thanks!

Apparently some sources say that I could only precede V and X.

Along with subtractive notation, Roman numerals also used additive notation so all of the digits were required and hence CMXCIX was considered standard, probably...

+3
Level 78
May 16, 2023
WOW !

You explained that infinitely better than my History tutor in high school, although that was almost "L" years ago (see what I did there).

TIL that there were fractions in Roman numerals!

+1
Level 73
May 16, 2023
Thanks toowise!

I'm grateful for those compliments. 😊

+2
Level 71
May 16, 2023
Agreed! I had never even thought about the idea of Roman numerals having fractions, or Roman numerals going above 5,000 for that matter. And I'm glad to see you back making blogs Aficionado!
+1
Level 73
May 17, 2023
Thanks Pab! :)

Yeah completely new concept for me too. Stumbled upon while browsing mathematical topics on Wikipedia.

+2
Level 70
May 16, 2023
Beautiful! It's incredible how Hindu-Arabic people created an universal numeric system, simpler and stronger than the others. I mean, in Italy we always study loads of things about the Romans, but we ignore other essential things that aren't so much Euro-centric.

P. S. I don't know about you, but we're allowed to use calculators in the Scuola Superiore, because when we're 13/14 and older it's supposed that we should have learned how to calculate without so... they let us use them.

+2
Level 73
May 17, 2023
Thank you Diana! 🙂

No, no, no! Calculator is a big no in Indian schools. While there are some private schools that allow calculator in exams, the vast majority don't. One is expected to remember the squares of all numbers till 30, cubes, square roots and cube roots of all the numbers until 10, and logarithms until 10 as well.

+3
Level 65
May 16, 2023
What a brilliant blog! It's very nice to see your blogs about new different topics, but with your iconic style. I didn't know anything past the halfway point of the blog, basically. If you've explained so many interesting things about this more well known topic, it's exciting to see the blogs about other mathematical topics. Maybe one about Indian scripts' numerals today?
+3
Level 65
May 16, 2023
why does this sound like an aficionado comment
+1
Level 73
May 17, 2023
Thank you for the supportive comment, Thread!

Indian numerals are Hindu-Arabic numerals so almost everyone knows that but I might try to make a blog for that one too along with some other mathematical concepts. 😉

+1
Level 73
May 18, 2023
They are the real Hindu-Arabic numerals! 😉
+2
Level 43
May 17, 2023
You had an easy concept and managed to get into depths of it brilliantly
+1
Level 73
May 17, 2023
I appreciate your kind words, MG!
+2
Level 68
May 21, 2023
This blog actually gave me a headache lol

I'd consider the best notation the shortest one, even if it isn't standard. However, I guess it can get a bit confusing.

+1
Level 73
May 21, 2023
Not intended to give headache, but hey it's maths!
+1
Level 68
May 22, 2023
Mmm, maths... everyone's favourite subject...
+1
Level 65
May 22, 2023
when shall we start on project math bhāṣa anti
+1
Level 68
May 22, 2023
నాకు తెలిదు, ఎప్పుదు నువంకునతునావు?