thumbnail

AP GOV Court Cases

court cases that are required for the AP exam. should be great for review :)
Quiz by qnscorp10
Rate:
Last updated: February 8, 2023
You have not attempted this quiz yet.
First submittedFebruary 8, 2023
Times taken45
Average score60.0%
Report this quizReport
5:00
Enter answer here
0
 / 15 guessed
The quiz is paused. You have remaining.
Scoring
You scored / = %
This beats or equals % of test takers also scored 100%
The average score is
Your high score is
Your fastest time is
Keep scrolling down for answers and more stats ...
Hint
Answer
Established supremacy of the U.S. Constitution and federal laws over state laws
McCulloch v.Maryland (1819)
Congress may not use the commerce clause to make possession of a gun in a school zone a federal crime
United States v. Lopez (1995)
School sponsorship of religious activities violates the establishment clause
Engel v. Vitale (1962)
Compelling Amish students to attend school past the eighth grade violates the free exercise clause
Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972)
Public school students have the right to wear black armbands in school to protest the Vietnam War
Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969)
Bolstered the freedom of the press, establishing a “heavy presumption against prior restraint” even in cases involving national security
New York Times Co. v. United States (1971)
Speech creating a “clear and present danger” is not protected by the First Amendment
Schenck v. United States (1919)
Guaranteed the right to an attorney for the poor or indigent
Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)
Extended the right of privacy to a woman’s decision to have an abortion
Roe v. Wade (1973)
The Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms for self-defense is applicable to the states
McDonald v. Chicago (2010)
Race-based school segregation violates the equal protection clause
Brown v. Board of Education (1954)
Political spending by corporations, associations, and labor unions is a form of protected speech under the First Amendment
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010)
Opened the door to equal protection challenges to redistricting and the development of the “one person, one vote” doctrine by ruling that challenges to redistricting did not raise “political questions” that would keep federal courts from reviewing such challenges
Baker v. Carr (1961)
Legislative redistricting must be conscious of race and ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act of 1965
Shaw v. Reno (1993)
Established the principle of judicial review empowering the Supreme Court to nullify an act of the legislative or executive branch that violates the Constitution
Marbury v. Madison (1803)
Comments
No comments yet