Golden Raspberry for Worst Actor

I'm not sure if you mean the actor that played the character that ultimately (spoiler alert!) WASN'T God, but I'm pretty sure that God Himself had no part in the making of that abomination. In fact, Star Trek V has been known to centerpiece the argument amongst atheists that God cannot possibly exist, else he would certainly have shielded us all from its sheer awfulness. This is the one film that I would actually WELCOME Spielberg and Lucas to go to town on. Slash it, burn it, add flying monkeys and space squirrels, make Spock shoot first, do whatever you have to do, but just please ERASE THIS MOVIE FROM EXISTENCE!!!

haha, well, whatever.. it definitely deserved a few Razzies.

"What does God need with a spaceship?" :-P

Bones: You don't ask the Almighty for his I.D.!

Uh.... yes you do, Bones! More so than ANYBODY else in the entire Universe!

Agree with clr. Maybe some who are convinced wrongly that I'm a biased flaming liberal will be surprised by this. But the criticism for Bush on this point was just one of many dumb things about F911.

"Put...the bunny...down." What are you TALKING about? That is about as iconic as a single movie line can get. It's right up there with "Rosebud" and "Frankly Scarlet, I don't give a damn." Cage was at his absolute best in Con Air. Razzie? Bah...should have won an Oscar.

Con Air is nowhere near Cage's worst performance. That has to be The Wicker Man..."Oh no, not the bees! Not the bees! My eyes! My eyes!"

"I like being in movies, Gary."

Funny thing is, I would probably pay to see a movie called “Space Ass.”

There is a very funny episode of 'Community' that takes on the issue of whether Nicolas Cage is a good actor or not. Ahmed, who is a major film buff, locks himself in his room and watches every Nicolas Cage film over and over, trying to work out if he is a genius or a hack. In the process he nearly drives himself insane. Eventually someone(I can't remember which character) saves Ahmed by explaining that you just have to accept that there is no definitive answer. Cage has done some brilliant acting roles, whilst others have been truly awful.

Jack: you're exactly the sort of guy that Cage does it for!!

EVERYthing? Some things, sure. But everything? That's paranoid fantasy with delusions of persecution. Making any defense of Cameron, who gave an objectively terrible performance in an objectively terrible movie (and part of why it was terrible was it's blatant and bizarre agenda so-on-the-nose-Cameron-actually-sits-the-audience-down-to-break-the-4th-wall-and-lecture-them.... literally...), is "proof."

Out of morbid curiosity, what part of the liberal elitist Hollywood agenda was it that led the Razzies to go after Catwoman?

Saving Christmas is possibly the worst movie I have seen in my entire life. I watched it out of curiosity, and it is somehow worse than the reviews make it out to be. The problem with it, as with many religious films, is that it is more interested in bludgeoning you to death with its religious message than with telling an interesting story. It's just so ham-fisted and slapdash. It wasn't even "so bad, it's good." It was just a really uncomfortable experience -- and not because of the religious angle. Everything about it was just impossibly inept and suffocating. I certainly won't dispute that Hollywood gets carried away with its tone-deaf political stances, but Saving Christmas absolutely deserved every bit of scorn it got. I should add that its message is appalling from either a religious or secular perspective. It tries to make the case that the commercialism corrupting Christmas is really a good thing. Preposterous.

The sad thing is that the movies he’s in where he’s actually good don’t do very well at the box office, so that’s why we’re stuck with all those stupid slapstick comedies.

On the other hand, Uncut Gems did pretty well at the box office and Sandler's performance was considered perhaps the best of his career, so maybe people are starting to look for a change.

Jim Carrey is immensely talented. His schtick is definitely not for everyone, but not a lot of people can pull off physical comedy the way he does. And his dramatic performances, particularly Man on the Moon, Truman Show, and Eternal Sunshine are really, really good. That he was not nominated for even one of them speaks to the Oscars' bias against "goofy" comedic actors.

closer to featuring a quiz about the Academy Awards (which are just as political as the razzies). Also anyone who thinks that Fox News is somehow controversial or that criticisms of them are politically motivated and not based in observable fact is probably, themselves, ignorant on the subject. This would be similar to identifying Joseph Goebbels as minister of propaganda on a quiz, then thinking "oh no, that's gonna be a political hot potato, don't want to offend any Neo Nazis in the crowd who think I'm not being neutral, better just take him off" .... the damage that has been done in recent years to things like truth, fact, and objective reality is very worrying. If the forces at work that so damaged these concepts continue to get their way, very soon *everything* will be deemed controversial and political. That's exactly what they want. "You have your facts, and we have alternative facts." Better men wouldn't give in to this madness.