Country | Population | City | % Correct |
---|---|---|---|
USA | 23.1 m | New York City | 99%
|
China | 20.9 m | Beijing | 98%
|
India | 33.4 m | Delhi | 98%
|
China | 40.0 m | Shanghai | 98%
|
USA | 17.7 m | Los Angeles | 97%
|
India | 26.6 m | Mumbai | 97%
|
China | 67.8 m | Guangzhou | 95%
|
USA | 9.90 m | Chicago | 93%
|
India | 17.4 m | Kolkata | 93%
|
USA | 7.55 m | Dallas | 91%
|
USA | 7.05 m | Houston | 91%
|
USA | 6.45 m | Miami | 90%
|
USA | 7.95 m | San Francisco | 90%
|
USA | 7.85 m | Boston | 87%
|
USA | 8.80 m | Washington, D.C. | 87%
|
China | 11.8 m | Wuhan | 87%
|
India | 13.7 m | Bangalore | 86%
|
China | 12.3 m | Xi'an | 86%
|
India | 12.2 m | Chennai | 85%
|
USA | 7.55 m | Philadelphia | 85%
|
India | 11.1 m | Hyderabad | 84%
|
China | 16.6 m | Chengdu | 80%
|
China | 7.30 m | Hong Kong | 80%
|
USA | 6.10 m | Atlanta | 79%
|
China | 11.4 m | Tianjin | 78%
|
China | 10.5 m | Chongqing | 77%
|
India | 9.30 m | Ahmedabad | 76%
|
China | 14.5 m | Xiamen | 75%
|
USA | 5.85 m | Detroit | 74%
|
China | 9.05 m | Nanjing | 72%
|
India | 7.55 m | Pune | 69%
|
China | 13.4 m | Hangzhou | 66%
|
China | 5.40 m | Harbin | 65%
|
China | 7.25 m | Qingdao | 58%
|
China | 8.55 m | Shenyang | 54%
|
India | 7.45 m | Surat | 54%
|
China | 10.5 m | Changsha | 53%
|
China | 7.50 m | Hefei | 50%
|
China | 9.45 m | Zhengzhou | 50%
|
China | 5.15 m | Dalian | 47%
|
China | 6.25 m | Kunming | 46%
|
China | 8.00 m | Shantou | 42%
|
China | 5.10 m | Nanning | 41%
|
China | 5.10 m | Wenzhou | 39%
|
China | 6.35 m | Jinan | 38%
|
China | 7.10 m | Ningbo | 35%
|
China | 4.90 m | Changchun | 28%
|
China | 6.00 m | Shijiazhuang | 27%
|
China | 5.75 m | Taiyuan | 25%
|
China | 4.85 m | Guiyang | 21%
|
Copyright H Brothers Inc, 2008–2024
Contact Us | Go To Top | View Mobile Site