Hawaii is the only U.S. state that produces coffee commercially.
77
Frederick the Great, king of Prussia, was an example of an "enlightened despot", a non-democratic leader who nevertheless works on behalf of the people.
78
Some people have claimed that the CIA plotted to assassinate Fidel Castro using an exploding cigar. However, there is no evidence that this was ever seriously proposed.
79
It is up for debate whether the Nile or the Amazon is the world's longest river.
80
Despite being an entire continent, Antarctica was one of the last places on Earth to be discovered by humans. It was first sighted by a Russian expedition in 1820.
The Quizmaster is an enlightened despot then - this is not meant as an offense, quite on the contrary. Everyone who runs a website is its monarch, at whose discretion it depends how to balance out censorship vs free speech.
Quizmaster, can you add Fidel Castro's assassination using a milkshake or Fidel Castro's cow? They're very interesting but I will understand your decision if you don't add it.
So about this number 78. There's a question in a quiz somewhere on JetPunk that asks what the CIA was doing with an exploding cigar (or something along those lines). Yet here it says it's false?
Maybe I'm suffering "Mandela Effect" but I vaguely remember it being mentioned in one of Quizmaster's notorious April Fools quizzes, or maybe in a quiz dedicated to these "Interesting Facts."
You can't really measure a river because of the coastline paradox. It depends on the measurement they used to measure each river with. The Coastline Paradox is used to describe how the length of a country's coastline approaches infinity as the measurement used to measure its length gets smaller.
No, the units don't matter - nothing is bigger or smaller because you use meters vs yards vs something else.
The coastline paradox refers to the fact that if you measure a whole rock, your measurement won't factor in all the little nooks and crannies in the rock.
And if you were to measure into the nooks and crannies in the rock, your measurement won't factor in the yet smaller indentations inside the nooks and crannies.
...this goes on until you measure it at the microscopic level.
I would agree that it is somewhat difficult to measure the length of a river, but not necessarily because of the coastline paradox - although it is perhaps a similar paradox.
The issue in measuring the length of a river is in determining the where the river starts and, perhaps moreso, where it ends.
If a river is consistent in width to a cliff where it falls into the ocean, that's perhaps a clear mark of its end, unless the water fall is curved, in which case do you measure to the middle, at the shore lines, the shortest point, longest point?
And when a river widens into an estuary or has a large delta - where does the river end? at the inland most end of the delta/estuary (and where do you draw that line)? or the furthest end of land/deposits? or when you get to the brackish water? or is it where the highest/strongest tides push into it?
The entertaining but implausible book 1421: The Year China Discovered America posits, among many other things, that the Chinese found Antarctica sometime between 1421 and 1423.
Antarctica ‘is’ the last piece of land to be discovered by humans. It is crazy to think that even decades before humans sent probes to space, we discovered every little piece of land on our planet.
I like to imagine what would've happened if there was an unknown continent and humans discovered it only when they sent satellites to space
The coastline paradox refers to the fact that if you measure a whole rock, your measurement won't factor in all the little nooks and crannies in the rock.
And if you were to measure into the nooks and crannies in the rock, your measurement won't factor in the yet smaller indentations inside the nooks and crannies.
...this goes on until you measure it at the microscopic level.
The issue in measuring the length of a river is in determining the where the river starts and, perhaps moreso, where it ends.
If a river is consistent in width to a cliff where it falls into the ocean, that's perhaps a clear mark of its end, unless the water fall is curved, in which case do you measure to the middle, at the shore lines, the shortest point, longest point?
And when a river widens into an estuary or has a large delta - where does the river end? at the inland most end of the delta/estuary (and where do you draw that line)? or the furthest end of land/deposits? or when you get to the brackish water? or is it where the highest/strongest tides push into it?
I like to imagine what would've happened if there was an unknown continent and humans discovered it only when they sent satellites to space