First compiled in around the seventh to eighth centuries, the 'Tribal Hidage' lists thirty-five Anglo-Saxon 'tribes' (i.e. peoples/kingdoms) and their respective size/wealth measured in units of land called 'hides'. How many of the Anglo-Saxon peoples recorded in the Tribal Hidage can you name?
Modern English equivalents of names are included where applicable.
The positions of peoples on the map are approximate; see stickied comment.
Hæthfeldlande (Hatfieldland) is excluded; see stickied comment.
The Tribal Hidage was primarily an economic assessment. One 'hide' was defined as enough land to support one homestead - therefore the greater a group's number of hides, the greater their territory and wealth.
Hæthfeldlande (Hatfieldland) was mentioned in the Tribal Hidage but was recorded as part of Lindsey, without an independent hidage assessment. Therefore, while it is one of the thirty-five tribes listed, I have decided to see it as included within Lindsey.
The list likely originated in Mercia, although some historians think the absence of the Northumbrian kingdoms (Bernicia and Deira) indicates a Northumbrian perspective. Were there more tribes that the compilers ignored? Were all the groups included in the list seen to be equally distinct and independent? We do not know.
Also, the term Anglo-Saxon should not be taken entirely literally. Elmet and the Cilternsætna are known to have had native British rulers at various times.
There is a spectrum of certainty regarding the geographical positions of groups mentioned in the Tribal Hidage. Major kingdoms that we know a lot about or groups whose names have been preserved in modern place-names can be placed on a map with a high degree of certainty. Others, however, have been lost to time. These were the Dark Ages, after all.
Groups whose general locations are definitively known: East Anglia, Elmet, Essex, Hicca, Hwicce, Kent, Lindsey, Mercia, Spalda, Sussex, Wessex, Westerna, Wihtwara, Wocensætna.
Groups whose locations are uncertain but likely: Arosætna, Bilmiga, Cilternsætna, Gifla, N+S Gyrwe, Pecsætna, Sweordora, E+W Willa, E+W Wixna.
Groups whose locations are unknown and involve a lot of guesswork: Færpinga, Hendrica, Herefinna, Noxgaga, Ohtgaga, Unecungaga, Widerigga, Wigesta.
Hæthfeldlande (Hatfieldland) was mentioned in the Tribal Hidage but was recorded as part of Lindsey, without an independent hidage assessment. Therefore, while it is one of the thirty-five tribes listed, I have decided to see it as included within Lindsey.
The list likely originated in Mercia, although some historians think the absence of the Northumbrian kingdoms (Bernicia and Deira) indicates a Northumbrian perspective. Were there more tribes that the compilers ignored? Were all the groups included in the list seen to be equally distinct and independent? We do not know.
Also, the term Anglo-Saxon should not be taken entirely literally. Elmet and the Cilternsætna are known to have had native British rulers at various times.
Groups whose general locations are definitively known: East Anglia, Elmet, Essex, Hicca, Hwicce, Kent, Lindsey, Mercia, Spalda, Sussex, Wessex, Westerna, Wihtwara, Wocensætna.
Groups whose locations are uncertain but likely: Arosætna, Bilmiga, Cilternsætna, Gifla, N+S Gyrwe, Pecsætna, Sweordora, E+W Willa, E+W Wixna.
Groups whose locations are unknown and involve a lot of guesswork: Færpinga, Hendrica, Herefinna, Noxgaga, Ohtgaga, Unecungaga, Widerigga, Wigesta.