This sociological perspective tends to see the media as a window on the world, which reflects and reports on the social world in an objective fashion:
-Journalists are seen as watchdogs of the public interest - moreover, media content is also shaped by the market.
-If the media do not give the public what they want, they become unprofitable and go out of business.
-From this perspective, problematic representations of Black people as criminals or Muslims as a threat reflect real fears.
-They are supposed to be the fears of the predominantly White readers of certain tabloid newspapers such as 'The Sun' or 'The Daily Mail' about what they perceive as 'outsider' groups with very different cultures from their own.
-From their perspective, newspapers are simply acting in the interests of their readers by demanding that those in power take action to control ethnic minority groups, for example, by restricting immigration or recruiting more police officers.
-The editors of those newspapers would probably argue that if they did not run these stories, their readers would desert them for other newspapers - sociologists from this perspective also argue that people can choose not to buy these newspapers because there is a diversity of media products, some of which portray ethnic minorities in a neutral or positive way.
Evaluations:
-Many White people may not have come into contact with Black people or Muslims, and may not have formed opinions about them - their only source of information is the media. If this is the case, the media are not mirroring their anxieties about ethnic minorities: journalists are actually constructing and shaping racist ideologies on behalf of their readers.
The Hegemonic theory of the media coming from this perspective may be more useful - this makes several interrelated points that may explain why mass media representations of ethnic minorities tend to be negative:
-Most owners, editors and journalists are White and consequently subscribe to a particular consensual view about how society should be - they share this view with their predominantly White audience or readership.
-This is the product of economics rather than ideology or racism - White opinion and interests are reflected in the media because White people constitute the majority audience - large audiences attract advertising revenue and consequently profit.
-This consensus approach means that the media professionals do not want to risk alienating their White audience by focusing on minority cultures or interests - moreover, this consensus approach probably results in ethnic minority media professionals distancing themselves from acting as advocates for minority groups.
-Consequently, then, the interests of Black people and Muslims are marginalised or rendered invisible.
-This consensus approach means that White experts and sources are at the top of the hierarchy of credibility - this means that journalists tend to go to the police or government for information on crime, immigration and radicalisation - Cottle observes that this means that media professionals devote little energy or resources to non-institutional or ethnic minority sources.
-Cottle argues that the pursuit of large audiences has led to the tabloidisation or dumbing down of news - this means that complex issues, for example, the impact of multiculturalism or fundamentalist religions, are less likely to be explained to audiences.
-Rather, news is likely to be reduced to simplistic soundbites and dramatic statements that highlight conflict but still fail to capture or illuminate the complexity of race relations in the UK.