Hint | Answer | % Correct |
---|---|---|
until the 1990s, the majority of labours funding was from? | trade unions | 100%
|
in 2015, despite an upsurge in membership, what percent did membership fees account for of Labour's overall annual income? | 19% | 0%
|
when? | 1997 | 0%
|
when? | 2000 | 0%
|
which report concluded that greater state funding might be the way forward? | 2007 Philips Report | 0%
|
when? | 2009 | 0%
|
what limit was imposed on spending per constituency? | £30,000 | 0%
|
over what amount did all donations have to be declared? | £5,000 | 0%
|
in 2014/15 how much money did labour receive from crabourne money? | £572,717 | 0%
|
should political parties be state funded? no- taxpayers shouldn't be expected to? | bankroll parties they oppose | 0%
|
for example, who's £1 million donation to labour caused contoversy? | bernie ecclestone | 0%
|
rather than? | courting potential donors | 0%
|
define short money | Cranbourne money but given to the house of commons not lords | 0%
|
because funding would be allocated based entirely on ? | electoral performance | 0%
|
yes- parties like lib dems would be on? | equal financial footing | 0%
|
what did his donation allegedly lead to the delay of? | f1 tobacco advertisement removal | 0%
|
should political parties be state funded ? yes- state funding allows politicians to? | focus on representing constituents | 0%
|
define cranbourne money | funds paid to opposition parties in the house of lords | 0%
|
in order to? (1) | help cover administrative costs | 0%
|
which allowed the electoral commission to? [1] | impose fines | 0%
|
what scandal during labours time in office came from this tactic? | loans for peerages | 0%
|
but parties have employed tactics like telling supporters to give ? | long term low interest loans | 0%
|
because there are always differences in ? | membership levels and human resources | 0%
|
most political parties receive income in the form of? | membership subscriptions | 0%
|
What led to an adverse impact on party finances? | partisan dealignment | 0%
|
what funding formula did he philips report suggest? | pence per voter | 0%
|
what are cranbourne and short money referred to as? | policy development grants | 0%
|
the rise of large individual donations led to the perception that... | political influence could be bought | 0%
|
(2) so they can? | provide proper scrutiny of government | 0%
|
which allowed the electoral commission to? [3] | reduce thresholds for declaring donations | 0%
|
in order to sidestep the new ? | regulations | 0%
|
which allowed the electoral commission to? [2] | restrict donations from non UK residents | 0%
|
what act imposed tighter regulations on spending following 2000? | the political parties and elections act | 0%
|
what act imposed an overall limit on party spending? | the political parties, elections and referendums act | 0%
|
new regulations have made party funding more? | transparent | 0%
|
no- parties will always be? | unequal | 0%
|
whilst the conservative funding came from? | wealthy individuals and businesses | 0%
|
yes - it would prevent the controversy of ? | wealthy individuals influencing government | 0%
|
Copyright H Brothers Inc, 2008–2024
Contact Us | Go To Top | View Desktop Site