Also: The debate about help for Puerto Rico after the Hurricane was about scale and sufficiency. If you start looking in the actual complaints and problems, you will see, that the aid dispatched was way to low and the US Government then misled about it, to avoid further tranches.
And also, in case you are not aware of it: The phrase "I saw a viral video" does not increase credibility. In fact, it might just do the opposite.
I agree that it's not *good* proof by any means, but all "viral video" means is that a video got popular (it might also insinuate that "the media" isn't reporting on the specific thing, but that's not a necessity). I just don't think it should be seen as a reason to discredit.
Sorry for being so pedantic :p
Edit* I now realize Newfoundland was on the other history map quiz.
Long gone are the glory days of Kingdom of Tibet. If the British would have gone ahead with their ambitions of annexing the place like it was the Crimean peninsula, things might have been different. In which way? So many theories to throw around.
They invaded after
Kingdom of Tripura
State of Hyderabad
State of Junagadh
Also I wonder some definitions: how come Japan is considered sovereign but not Germany? Also the sovereignity of Vietnam, Indonesia etc. that time is at least questionable.